![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| please help in rsync | naree | SUN Solaris | 10 | 6 Days Ago 04:34 AM |
| rsync over ftp | Hitori | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 03-14-2008 09:42 AM |
| rsync in ftp | Euler04 | Shell Programming and Scripting | 5 | 10-24-2005 04:17 AM |
| Rsync | darknite87 | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 1 | 06-06-2002 12:37 PM |
| rsync | wz253 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 6 | 09-04-2001 03:44 PM |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
rsync vs cp
Hi guys,
I will be copying data from one FS to another. (only once) These are local Filesystems... Which tool would be more efficient to use in this case? There is a huge amount of data that needs to be copied... (1.5TB) John |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
|||
|
To answer that let me explain the difference.
Basically cp will perform a copy from one location to another. rsync is more advanced. Its more designed for synchronizing directories. It can copy files from one location to another like cp but if the file already exists or has not changed size or modification time (depending on the flags you use) it will not copy that file again to save time. The time it takes to copy a file should not differ between rsync and cp. |
|||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |