![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Rules & FAQ | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
Other UNIX.COM Threads You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| passing variable from bash to perl from bash script | arsidh | Shell Programming and Scripting | 10 | 4 Weeks Ago 09:25 AM |
| Differences between SAN and NAS | jigarlakhani | Filesystems, Disks and Memory | 2 | 11-15-2003 01:09 PM |
| What are the differences between 'bash' and 'sh' | deckard | Shell Programming and Scripting | 7 | 05-09-2003 06:25 AM |
| differences nis nis+ | joerg | IP Networking | 2 | 06-24-2002 12:47 AM |
![]() |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Bash differences on unix's
I am using bash on two different unix versions and for some reason the commands operate slightly differently. For example, 'ls * -la' gives me an error on one unix system, but works fine on a different system. The versions of unix are actually OS x and linux, and both systems are running GNU bash 3.2.
Since I am switching between different systems often, the different command line syntax is really annoying. Does anyone know if the differences are because of a compile option or is there a config file somewhere that results in the different behavior? I have tried compiling bash from source with what I think is the same conditions on both systems, but I can't resolve the differences Thanks |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
|||
|
Hi,
I suppose I could set up a series of aliases for the differences between the bashes. But I would like to know why the same source code compiles differently on different system without going through the code itself. I can't seem to find any explanation anywhere online to explain what I am seeing, and there is nothing in the configure docs on it. But this is not a major problem for me, it is just that I got used to the way bash works under Linux, hence I often use syntax like 'ls * -la' rather than the more standard 'ls -l *'. And I seem to be looking up man pages quite a lot these days to find out what the syntax is for common commands. Thanks, |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|