Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Grep question. | saurabhsinha23 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 3 | 12-11-2007 01:58 AM |
| Question about GREP | Adriel | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 16 | 03-22-2007 08:03 AM |
| Another grep question | kingdbag | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 6 | 10-27-2006 02:56 AM |
| grep & sed question | der Kopf | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 11-22-2004 04:49 AM |
| Grep question | eloquent99 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 4 | 02-20-2003 10:49 AM |
Powered by 
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
10-04-2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
grep question
I wanted to search a for all lines containing ERROR but not errors that contained the word "foo" (for example). The only way I could figure out to do it was:
grep ERROR myfile.log | grep -v foo is there a way to do this with one grep command instead of two? One grep is faster than two, especially for large files like log files.  |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode
