![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dual boot x86 Sol 10, and Linux | jdel80 | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 0 | 10-05-2005 09:57 AM |
| dual boot unix and win2k | edwardtisdale | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 0 | 09-07-2004 12:16 PM |
| install linux from cd, for dual boot w/98 | joe barone | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 10 | 08-06-2002 10:08 AM |
| XP/Linux dual boot | XDC_Wolf | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 07-03-2002 11:35 PM |
| DUAL BOOT redhat linux 7.3 - W2K | maxthree | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 4 | 05-13-2002 05:40 AM |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Again Linux and Win2k dual boot
Hello, sorry to bug again....a friend of mine who works for a software company asked the network guy there .....I want to install Linux 7.2 on my windows 2000 box....Mr. Network said that I should have installed linux first then 2k.....does it really make a difference which operating system is installed first....I dont know alot about either one...but I want to learn....Please be gentle on me....
|
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
|||
|
Actually install 2000 first
I'm running windows and Linux on a dual boot solution myself. I personally think it's easier to install windows first then Linux. Just make two partitions when you're in the windows2000 setup. Make sure the Linux partition is about 2 gigs in size. Linux is going to partition the partition again, this time with three, SWAP, ROOT and BOOT.
|
|||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |