![]() |
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| production server won't start please help me! | NewSolarisAdmin | SUN Solaris | 3 | 05-21-2008 02:34 AM |
| MP-MPICH 1.5 (Production branch) | iBot | Software Releases - RSS News | 0 | 02-02-2008 11:30 AM |
| help:comparing two directory tree structures only | raj_thota | Shell Programming and Scripting | 7 | 10-24-2005 02:21 PM |
| Dominant Unix in production? | etc | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 06-28-2005 12:52 PM |
| music production, unix | nydel | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 04-08-2002 12:47 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
Production Directory Structures
We (our company) has just purchased a new IBM unix machine. We have been doing some research and have found that it is NOT a good idea to put your own in-house-written applications under the existing file folders such as /usr or /bin ect. Instead you should place these applications in directories created below the /HOME directory. Is this correct??
Are there suggestions as to where to put your in house developed applications?? Thanks in advance for any replies. |
|
||||
|
Most large applications place all their code and libraries under a wholly separate directory tree, for example Oracle, Passport, etc. If you want failover, each directory should be on it's own filesystem and physical disk, served from a SAN or other file server. Whichever system is currently in the role of production box can then mount them.
|
|
||||
|
So it does sound like putting directories under /usr is not wise and we would be better off creating a production directory structure under the /HOME directory.
Thanks for the replies and please feel free to add to this if my above assumption is not correct OR there are differing opinions. Thanks again. |
|
||||
|
I wouldn't recommend /home, this is really for users' home directories for their private data. I'm with Jim's advice on this one - keep major applications in their own file systems so that they can be backed up easily and can't be affected by a UNIX installation/upgrade.
For a good (and very detailed) overview of (one group's ideas) of how directories should structured, see http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html |
|
||||
|
I'm a little confused. When you say "keep major applications in their own file systems" do you mean create their own directories at the root level????
After briefly reading the detailed document you provided (thanks) it said that you should not create additional subdirectories at the root level. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|