![]() |
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mounting Ext2 and Ext3 | XP_2600 | SUN Solaris | 3 | 10-09-2006 02:15 PM |
| ReiserFS vs ext3 vs anything else? | fishsponge | Filesystems, Disks and Memory | 6 | 09-30-2005 06:45 PM |
| ext3 filesystem | comadreja | Filesystems, Disks and Memory | 3 | 03-11-2002 10:47 PM |
| Anyone else see a performance hit from ext3 | 98_1LE | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 01-06-2002 07:35 PM |
| Convert filesystem from reiserfs to ext2 | vancouver_joe | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 1 | 10-02-2001 12:53 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|||||
|
/ext3 is a more advanced filesytem than /ext2. A /ext2 filesystem can be upgraded to a /ext3 filesystem. /ext3 is journaled, so it recovers well from crashes. This increased reliability is the biggest deal. Given a choice between the two /ext3 is a clear choice. There are few other added features too.
Pretty much everyone will agree that /ext2 is obsolete. But at this point, the ReiserFS folks and/or the XFS folks will want to tell you that their favorite FS is better than /ext3. We have had threads like that before and nothing useful came from them. Please remember that our rules state: (8) No BSD vs. Linux vs. Windows or similar threads. So /ext3, ReiserFS, and XFS have all been mentioned. Let's not have a fistfight over which is best. I'll leave the thread open for now. But it's probable that it won't be open for long. ![]() |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|