![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vi editor | jazz | High Level Programming | 2 | 05-08-2009 08:46 AM |
| regarding vi editor | girish_shukla | SCO | 4 | 11-19-2008 10:36 PM |
| Epic Editor was not able to obtain a license for your use. Feature Epic Editor :Licen | durgaprasadr13 | SUN Solaris | 1 | 10-13-2008 07:39 AM |
| set EDITOR=vi -> default editor not setting for cron tab | aarora_98 | Shell Programming and Scripting | 6 | 09-13-2008 02:01 AM |
| Pasting text in VI editor from a different editor | harishmitty | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 10 | 09-10-2008 06:22 PM |
| View Poll Results: What is your preferred text editor? | |||
| vi or vi clone such as vim |
|
1,151 | 72.66% |
| emacs |
|
88 | 5.56% |
| notepad |
|
83 | 5.24% |
| EditPlus |
|
69 | 4.36% |
| UltraEdit |
|
68 | 4.29% |
| pico |
|
31 | 1.96% |
| nano |
|
45 | 2.84% |
| mcedit |
|
8 | 0.51% |
| nedit |
|
22 | 1.39% |
| gedit |
|
8 | 0.51% |
| TextPad |
|
11 | 0.69% |
| Voters: 1584. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
well... I'm okay with vi, I use it when I'm trying to edit something quickly from the terminal, but if I can't imagine starting a project in even nano.
Also, jedit has been really going on my nerves!!! I'm not committed. Still searching for a better one... I want one that recognizes the code (at least tcl and c++), have tabs to keep many files open, search for where variables are set, etc. And be free of course ![]() |
|
||||
|
The witch ("which") method works better than most
Quote:
Whichever one comes up with a path to an executable, like /usr/bin/emacs2 instead of a lot of garbage telling you where editor x isn't in your execution or environment paths, that's the one you have. And you may have more than one. Try them out and see which one you're more attuned to. BZT Last edited by SilversleevesX; 05-21-2009 at 09:33 AM.. Reason: Remembered why I "Which" |
|
||||
|
I use vi on all system where I have shell, but I also love KomodoEdit - it's free, and they support "vi bindings" so I can have the best of all things... including code completion/hints, templates, projects, etc. while still being able to maneuver efficiently using vi commands.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| learn unix, linux, linux commands, regex, regular expressions, shell script, shell scripting, solaris, unix commands, unix scripting, unix scripting basics |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|