![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help ! SQL and Proc *C | iwbasts | High Level Programming | 5 | 05-18-2006 03:42 AM |
| mounting /proc or /usr | moxxx68 | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 5 | 12-05-2004 04:10 PM |
| /proc | aojmoj | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 3 | 11-20-2002 05:54 PM |
| about /proc | fuqiang1976 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 09-10-2001 07:46 AM |
| /proc 100% | asutoshch | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 04-01-2001 02:24 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
The applications (binary) are running fine as expected (it should not make difference whether it is a background process or a Unix Deamon). And all the necessary/required I/O with respect to applications are occurring fine with out any issues.
So, in this case, one would expect that 'ps' command with right options should list this process & its current status!! It sounds like all this was working fine until few days back, and suddenly he is seeing that "PS" is not listing the desired process, while the desired process is still running properly. ps -ef not listing all the running demons so we thought some issue with proc |
|
||||
|
First ask the user what he has changed, then make sure you can duplicate the problem in a separate privileged environment. There's a BIG chance something changed in the environment.
Don't assume /proc is messed up right of the bat. |
|
||||
|
HI,
ps -ef lists all the demons running but only not listing few. Any how I found the reason why its not listing because ps command owner and group changed to normal user instead of root. I don't know how ps command owner and group changed to normal user? Thanks a lot Bache Gowda |
|
|||||
|
Do "normal" users own other executables (in the /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin and /usr/sbin directories)? Sometimes you'll see executables owned by "bin" - this is normal. If a true "normal" user owns these files, chances are you've been compromised!
Does anybody other than yourself know the root password? Have you noticed lots of failed ssh connections, etc? Check your logs (/var/log/messages) and see if anything naughty is going on. Good luck. If you've been compromised, you're only real option is to restore trusted executables - whether this be from installation media/backups depends upon your disaster recovery procedures. And all of this assumes that you actually have been compromised. And remember, a great deal of compromises come from somebody inside organisations Cheers ZB |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| linux |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|