![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| fre in vmstat | Negm | AIX | 1 | 10-26-2006 07:53 AM |
| vmstat | Syed_45 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 07-27-2006 03:16 PM |
| vmstat | big123456 | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 4 | 12-21-2005 06:56 AM |
| vmstat | anent | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 3 | 11-27-2001 10:22 AM |
| Vmstat | DPAI | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 09-19-2001 08:55 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
vmstat
When I exeute vmstat (e.g. vmstat 30 2),
in some machines I get some wierd result as the first line. like: -117% or 208% for CPU idle percentage. But the second line is alright. Could someone explain this please. Thanks ! Chaadana |
|
|||||
|
Maybe, but some of the stuff isn't computed by subtracting the previous values. And now you have to wait 5 seconds to see anything.
Also, the previous history was supposed to initialed to zero. So that first line was supposed to be an "average" since the system was booted. Today's systems are fast so those 32 bit counters wrap around too much for that. And when one counter wraps and another didn't, calculations involving multiple counters get screwy. I still see references to the first line serving as an average since boot, but this doesn't work anymore. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|