The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Top Forums > UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers
Google UNIX.COM


UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !!

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
configure full duplex hassan2 Linux 4 01-21-2008 11:31 PM
100 gigabit full duplex csaunders SUN Solaris 4 04-13-2006 12:06 PM
full -duplex ? parvathy High Level Programming 1 06-11-2005 07:07 AM
Full duplex at HUB? merlin UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 4 09-03-2002 05:41 AM
How to configure Full Duplex and TCP/IP marc3483 UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 07-24-2002 09:55 AM

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 61
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
Full Duplex Howto

Dear Members,

I was reading a few posts and saw something about installing two Nics so one could use Full Duplex. I remember back in the day of dial up, you could have two modems and use one for upstream and one for downstream. This was called shotgunning. It seems that you can now do the same with Nics. I am guessing that you would just put two Nics on your board, then hook up both cat5s to the switch. However, I just have to ask; won't that cause collisions? Anyway, I was wondering if you all would like to clearify some of this and help me with the actual software part of setting this up in either BSD or Linux.

Thanks alot!
Phobos
Reply With Quote
Forum Sponsor
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 232
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
Most cards offer Full-Duplex today. I think the reason more people use 2 cards nowadays is for assigning multiple IPs to their box.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 61
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
hmmmmmm, so it would make more since to have two cards, one for the external internet and another for the local internal network? So, then it doesn't help to have two servering the internet to help with overhead?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2005
Perderabo's Avatar
Unix Daemon
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Washington DC Area
Posts: 8,253
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
Our ethernets are ethernet switches. These are big comm devices that link to each computer. This is a different architecture than the original ethernet where all the computers talked over the same wire. The ethernet switches have a port for each system. Each port can send and recieve at the same time if the ethernet card in the computer supports it. There is no collision because there are two data paths. We do have some servers with two cards going to the same network. Each card gets a separate ip address. But this is usually done for more bandwidth to the network. The only other reason is redundancy, if one card goes down the other takes over. But we are more likely to use redundant servers for that.

You don't need another card for multiple ip addresses. Every version of unix that I know has some way to assign multiple ip addresses to a single card.

It is possible to have different cards going to different networks. If ip forwarding is turned off, this is done for redunancy again. Turn ip forwarding on, and such a computer will act as a router. Our network folks don't like that and we are prohibited from doing that. We must use routers for our routers.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2005
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 61
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Stumble this Post!Spurl this Post!
Alright, I understand. Thank you for clearifying that.
Reply With Quote
Google UNIX.COM
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


The 50 most popular UNIX and Linux searches.
Google Search Cloud for The UNIX and Linux Forums
421 service not available, remote server has closed connection ^m automate ftp autosys awk trim bash eval bash exec bash for loop command copy/move folder in unix couldn't set locale correctly curses.h cut command in unix export command in unix find grep find mtime find null character in a unix file grep multiple lines grep or grep recursive hp-ux ifconfig inaddr_any inappropriate ioctl for device lynx javascript mailx attachment mget mtime ping port remove first character from string in k shell replace space by comma , perl script rsync ftp scp recursive segmentation fault(coredump) sftp script snoop unix solaris change ip address stale nfs file handle syn_sent tar exclude tar extract to folder test: argument expected unix unix .profile unix forum unix forums unix internals unix mtime unix simulator unix.com vi substitute while loop within while loop shell script


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:35 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2008 The CEP Blog All Rights Reserved -Ad Management by RedTyger Visit The Global Fact Book

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101