![]() |
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers If you're not sure where to post a UNIX or Linux question, post it here. All UNIX and Linux newbies welcome !! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Upgrading to Slackware 12.1 | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 06-03-2008 12:20 PM |
| Upgrading SSH | run_time_error | SUN Solaris | 0 | 01-23-2007 02:24 AM |
| Upgrading from 5.1.0.0 to 5.2.0.0 | Target | AIX | 5 | 10-30-2006 10:41 PM |
| upgrading apache | lungs | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 02-03-2005 10:47 AM |
| Upgrading to PHP 4.3.4 from 4.2.2 | Blackrose | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 3 | 11-20-2003 02:11 AM |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Upgrading Apache
Hi I run FEDORA CORE 4 and I have been asked to upgrade the apache to the latest version--this machine is using 2.0.54 Apache which is really OLD. The problem is that upgrading the RPM fails because of all these dependencies. Those dependencies in turn have other dependencies. I am new to UNIX/Linux but wouldn't it be easier just to update the OS, install the new Apache (which I have done for a test) and restore the data?
I am asking the question to gather what others would do if they were forced to upgrade something old on an os which is old itself. Seems that a lot of file would need upgrading since they are just "old" |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|