![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX Desktop for Dummies Questions & Answers Questions regarding GNOME, KDE, CDE, Open Office, etc go here. All UNIX and Linux Newbies Welcome !! |
| View Poll Results: Window Manager of the ... Choice | |||
| fluxbox |
|
4 | 15.38% |
| openbox |
|
2 | 7.69% |
| pekwm |
|
1 | 3.85% |
| e16 / e17 |
|
0 | 0% |
| fvwm |
|
4 | 15.38% |
| beryl / compiz / metisse |
|
4 | 15.38% |
| ion / dwm / wmii / ratpoison |
|
1 | 3.85% |
| window maker |
|
3 | 11.54% |
| icewm |
|
4 | 15.38% |
| blackbox |
|
3 | 11.54% |
| 4dwm |
|
0 | 0% |
| twm |
|
1 | 3.85% |
| mwm |
|
3 | 11.54% |
| dtwm |
|
2 | 7.69% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| dynamic window manager 4.9 (Default branch) | iBot | Software Releases - RSS News | 0 | 04-04-2008 09:00 AM |
| Brightside extends GNOME window manager | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 01-21-2008 12:10 PM |
| Java Desktop Icon - which window manager? | herbmiller | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 01-17-2008 12:30 PM |
| Take charge of your window manager with WMCTRL and Devil's Pie | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 12-21-2007 02:20 AM |
| Setting window manager manually for GNome | auswipe | UNIX Desktop for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 02-27-2002 10:04 PM |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like mwm most. First, because it has (on AIX, where i work most) no "virtual screens", which i dislike. I like physical screens and can't have enough of them - a workplace with 3 screens (preferably 22" CRTs, not that TFT crap) is what it takes to make me happy. Virtual screens, though - is like having the picture of a cup on the wall instead of having a cup of coffee for real.
Second, it hasn't that many "features" like fvwm, etc.. Yes, its quite "barebone", but that means it is easily and quickly configured and not like fvwm, where you have to compose a 5000-line document just to change the colours of the window frames. Right-click-into-the-root-window to fire up the menu (which is easily constructed) is all the functionality i ever needed and will need. More would be just confusing for a simple mind like me. Third: it is aesthetically pleasing to look at it. Maybe its me but i simply like its elegant look. bakunin |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
no sawfish! I use FVWM, Fluxbox, IceWM and WindowMaker too when I feel like something different, but by far I use Sawfish the most.
|
|||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |