![]() |
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Expert-to-Expert. Learn advanced UNIX, UNIX commands, Linux, Operating Systems, System Administration, Programming, Shell, Shell Scripts, Solaris, Linux, HP-UX, AIX, OS X, BSD. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| authentication of new user | dwallace | Forum Support Area for Unregistered Users & Account Problems | 1 | 02-22-2008 09:37 PM |
| Oracle's new centralized security and user authentication services ... - Help Net Sec | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 08-09-2007 09:40 PM |
| Disallowing certain characters from user input | paqman | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 08-09-2007 06:44 PM |
| SFTP- Non-interactive user authentication | dheeruchakri | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 03-10-2006 12:14 PM |
| User Authentication | meyersp | SUN Solaris | 3 | 09-12-2003 09:39 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
disallowing user/pass authentication in favor of a pure key system?
i finally got my key-pair system working... sort of a makeshift eToken
system. however, i only want to allow this sytem for system access. i don't want to allow for the standard user/pass authentication system. right now i changed the following: # To disable tunneled clear text passwords, change to no here! PasswordAuthentication no (i removed the comment and changed it to no). however, i can still login with my user/pass. any idea how i can prevent this? |
|
||||
|
okay, i'm confused. how exactly is this going to help me do what i want to do?
won't this prevent any normal login from happening? i simply want to kill the user/pass system and enforce keys. i have my private key on my usb-flash device. and i only want to allow access to my network if the private key off the USB device is used... and no other way. it's a really ugly way of using eTokens but if it works... i can wow some clients... ![]() one though occured to me... but i really don't want to do it this way. i could make the userpass word a long string of garbage... but... no... this is still allowing for a user/pass method. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|