|
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Expert-to-Expert. Learn advanced UNIX, UNIX commands, Linux, Operating Systems, System Administration, Programming, Shell, Shell Scripts, Solaris, Linux, HP-UX, AIX, OS X, BSD. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Naming convention for Libraries.. | rkshukla14 | UNIX Desktop for Dummies Questions & Answers | 0 | 02-09-2007 08:31 AM |
| how to view loaded shared libraries by running processes in linux | princelinux | High Level Programming | 3 | 01-17-2007 07:44 AM |
| Shared Libraries | wojtyla | Linux | 1 | 09-16-2005 01:14 AM |
| shared libraries | thalex | High Level Programming | 2 | 11-29-2001 09:32 AM |
| Shared libraries | Micky | High Level Programming | 0 | 11-12-2001 04:25 AM |
Powered by 
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
11-18-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Naming conventions for shared libraries in Linux
Hello,
I'm wondering what is the naming conventions for *.so shared libraries in linux. For example, a library in /lib, say libcrypt-2.7.so has a symbolic link called libcrypt.so.1 pointing to it, yet libncursesw.so.5.6 has a symbolic link called libncursesw.so.5 pointing to it. What is the relationship between the numbers in the symbolic links and the actual targets? |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode
