The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Top Forums > UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Google UNIX.COM


UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Advanced UNIX and Linux questions go here. Expert-to-Expert.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Automate FTP process and autorestart on link failure sdcoms IP Networking 5 08-14-2008 02:45 PM
Difference between hard link and soft link kamakshi s UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 06-26-2008 05:05 AM
need some info about symbolic link and hard link detective linux UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 01-08-2008 04:36 AM
Difference between hard link and soft link in unix RAJACHOKALINGAM UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 08-01-2006 01:10 AM
Differences between hard link and soft link penguin-friend UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 3 03-08-2002 12:49 PM

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #8  
Old 07-10-2008
Registered User
 

Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 26
You can map the shared memory IDs with pmap, but I don't believe you can map the semaphore to a process. You can with Solaris 10 and dtrace, but not on 9.

I was thinking lsof might help, but I just tried it out and it looks like a no-go.

Here's a quote from a Tivoli doc I did a quick lookup on:

Code:
For shared memory and semaphore usage make sure that the kernel parameters of your 
system have at least the following values (minimum requirements): 
     set semsys:seminfo_semmap=50
     set semsys:seminfo_semmni=50
     set semsys:seminfo_semmns=300
     set semsys:seminfo_semmnu=150
     set semsys:seminfo_semopm=50
     set semsys:seminfo_semume=50
     set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=125
And although this was listed for HPUX, and is really old, here's is how they recommend you calculate the needed value:

Code:
semaphores = 60 + (2 x maxSessions)
Where maxSessions is the maximum number of concurrent client sessions.
Reply With Quote
Forum Sponsor
  #9  
Old 08-14-2008
Registered User
 

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 16
Thanks for the info Diabolist, might come in handy.

I got relayed some information on what caused my problem... It seems it was because of a network problem causing the TSM sessions to not closing properly and constantly reopening a new session.

To bad I wasn't able to get a more detailed technical explanation.
Reply With Quote
Google The UNIX and Linux Forums
Reply

Tags
solaris

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:44 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2008. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger Visit The Complex Event Processing Blog

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0