The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Top Forums > UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Google UNIX.COM


UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Advanced UNIX and Linux questions go here. Expert-to-Expert.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to restore original package after uninstalling the upgraded package using rpm amitpansuria Linux 0 05-27-2008 01:08 AM
Could be a corrupted file? kaugrs HP-UX 1 01-16-2008 08:22 AM
LV corrupted Alfredo Jimenez AIX 1 08-23-2005 05:38 AM
kernerl corrupted art_malabanan SCO 3 09-24-2003 07:45 PM

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Exclamation .exe package is corrupted

Hi,

Yes, it is happening with .exe files as per the current stand point. I have tried .doc, .pdf, .zip and other files that have no issues.

I don't have a clue to find the difference. Visible difference is that they have different set of information in file properties.

My file download application is hosted on HPUX, so the file comes from file area to HPUX web server and then it is downloaded to local machine from HPUX box to local machine through browser.

The working client is a Windows utility, it downloads the file from file area to local machine and there is no OS difference as per my understanding.

Does the OS flavors difference harm the .exe file while transfer? Sorry, if I am too dumb with this question. In fact I am. This thing has started to prick a little more than anticipated.

I have attached a jpg that has the snapshots of both the property windows.

Thanks again for all the help.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg untitled.JPG (76.2 KB, 2 views)
Reply With Quote
Forum Sponsor
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008
era era is offline
Herder of Useless Cats
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: /there/is/only/bin/sh
Posts: 3,094
Screen shots don't help much to find out where the difference is coming from. Are, say, the first five bytes identical? What about the last five?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Thumbs up .exe package is corrupted

Hi Era,

No solution but I am happy that I could find the problem. The one file that I called faulty is correct but it has lost its feature of MSI (Microsoft soft self-extracting installable). I tried opening the file using WinRAR which is similar to Winzip. It gave me the unzipped contents and I found one exe within that which works like a charm. The difference to users now is that they see all the individual components instead of a self extracting single executable.

Any idea that makes it a MSI in HPUX environment will be great. Anyway, the users won't be unhappy with the current solution.

I got that idea when I used the file command to check the attributes - It was indicating ASCII cpio archive. Am I close to any solution here?

Special thanks to Era; you are wonderful.

Regards,
Reply With Quote
Google UNIX.COM
Reply

Tags
cpio

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2008 The CEP Blog All Rights Reserved -Ad Management by RedTyger Visit The Global Fact Book

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0