Hi,
I read up about maxssiz when having problems with stack overflow.
I check on the below on my HP-UX as:

Parameter Current Dyn Planned Module Version
===============================================================================
maxssiz 0x17000000 - 0X17000000

When using gdb, i check that the value for a local array variable is as follows:

(gdb) print &s[1000000]
$2 = 0x690e7a50 "c"

Does this imply that the memory address is within the max allocated?

Also, how do i interpret the address in dec, again the maxssiz value in dec?

Any help is really appreciated.
Thanks

gdb :
printf "%d\n", 0x690e7a50

displays a hex value as decimal.

What problem are you having with your code?

Hi,
I basically want to ensure that the above message is because of a stack overflow.

On checking maxssiz using sysdef, i get a value: 0-98048.

This is beleive is the value from 0 - The frame base, to 98048.
Also, a kmtune gives me:

Parameter Current Dyn Planned Module Version
===============================================================================
maxssiz 0x17000000 - 0X17000000

I haven't used kmtune before. Does 0X17000000 imply the upper limit of stack address???

So, I wanted to check the value of stack in the core file.

On Sun, this can be done using pmap.
But i cannot find an equivalent command on HP.

And was fiddling around with GDB, to check if i could find some way around with this, on GDB.

Can anyone help please?

Thanks!

I'm not sure what kind your OS is, but if it is Linux:
Instead of adjusting kernel settings, try looking at the output of ulimit -s.
And see what that says. You probably have a code error.

If you really are blowing the stack - which I doubt - try using heap instead of stack.
In other words make the array a global array, not on the stack. You can do this two ways by:
1. declaring it global
or
2. using malloc to create the storage for the array

Changing kernel parameters is the last and worst choice - what if you want to run the code on another machine?

Thanks Jim.
Anyways, i thought that all local variables were allocated on stack.
By what you say, are local arrays (string and int) allocated on heap ?(I know malloc allocates memory on heap).

Variables declared "outside" a function, global variables, are not on the stack.
malloc does allocate memory in heap.

To see how you code allocates memory now, use the size command. I think

size -f myprog