|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Advanced UNIX and Linux questions go here. Expert-to-Expert. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PRo*C program for SQL queries using threading concept | user71408 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 0 | 05-20-2008 11:11 PM |
| LUN concept | Prem | HP-UX | 1 | 02-22-2007 02:02 PM |
| Having difficulty with UNIX concept. Please help! | ALon | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 4 | 01-11-2007 08:42 AM |
| IPTABLES Firewall concept help | Bradley Porter | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 01-02-2007 02:39 AM |
| concept of mount point | Vikas Sood | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 3 | 06-08-2006 03:31 PM |
 |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#8
04-09-2008
|
|||
|
|||
Semaphores & Mutex
Hi All,
I wanted to know the exact the difference in implemenation of semaphores and mutexes. As Mutex has some protection mechanism , but semaphore doesn't.. 
|
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
#9
04-10-2008
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not understanding you I guess. Semaphores are locking primitives. You can implement mutual exclusion (mutexes) using binary semaphores.
Wikipedia is a good place to start conceptually.
|
|||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |
|
| Tags |
| linux |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
