![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Expert-to-Expert. Learn advanced UNIX, UNIX commands, Linux, Operating Systems, System Administration, Programming, Shell, Shell Scripts, Solaris, Linux, HP-UX, AIX, OS X, BSD. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| chown | BG_JrAdmin | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 04-17-2009 09:22 AM |
| Chgrp and Chown ??? | skyineyes | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 05-28-2008 07:45 AM |
| chown | ariec | AIX | 2 | 08-14-2007 05:24 PM |
| chown and permissions | ithost | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 07-03-2003 09:18 AM |
| chown and NIS | Jody | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 07-01-2003 03:57 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
/etc ownership was changed via chown
Hello all:
I have a couple of boxes located in New York, both running SunOS 5.6. I, unfortunately, am located in Pittsburgh and do not have console access to these boxes. A co-worker was attempting to build a user account in one of these boxes, and mistakenly did a: chown username * What he did not realize was that he WAS NOT in the users home dir, but rather in /etc. He basically changed ownership of all files in /etc from root to username. So, now I cannot log into the box remotely...I cannot rlogin from it's partner server, I cannot run rsh, resh, or rcmd from the partner server. Basically, I'm hosed. Any ideas? I thought about doing a tape restore, but I cannot log in, obviously, to do that either. Chris D. |
|
||||
|
I did locate 5.6 discs, and we have a guy flying up to the site tonight. Our plan of attack is to follow these instructions:
http://slacksite.com/technotes/fileperm.html Anyone see anything wrong with using this procedure?? -cd |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|