The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Top Forums > UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
.
google unix.com



UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Expert-to-Expert. Learn advanced UNIX, UNIX commands, Linux, Operating Systems, System Administration, Programming, Shell, Shell Scripts, Solaris, Linux, HP-UX, AIX, OS X, BSD.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AIX 5.2 to 5.3 migration Fred Vogel AIX 4 05-25-2008 10:58 PM
migration of sun box 5.8 to 5.10 saini707 SUN Solaris 3 02-15-2008 10:04 AM
SAN migration Hils HP-UX 0 06-17-2006 04:20 AM
AIX Migration Student37 UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 1 07-27-2005 03:33 PM
migration omran UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 2 04-13-2003 12:38 PM

 
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Bulgarian Greek Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2006
new2ss new2ss is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 133
Migration

Hi all,

Would appreciate advise on my situation.

Currently server A is in production. Server A takes in data from Server X, does some processing and send to server Y. We are going to develop a different system in server B, something like an enhanced version of A. Server A will be retired once server B is commissioned. Server B is also required to take data from server X, does some processing and send to server Y.

What strategy should i adopt?

1) Develop B as a standalone. However, when i conduct end to end testing for B, B must also send results to Y. But because Y is an external server, it cannot take in results from A and B. The data will be out of sync*. If i were to adopt this strategy, how can i seperate the results from A and B ? Meaning, how can i verify that B is crunching the data correctly, and successful sending to Y ( eg, comparision with data from A) and at the same time only trigger the results from A to Y?
****
The reason that the data will be out of sync is because A may be sending
1 2 3,1,2,3
and B is sending 1,2,3.
Something like an summary of A. Y is only interested in unique values, hence B is more optimal
****
2) Develop B and at the same time bring in A. That is, while developing B, make provisions to integrate A. Hence only one copy of the results will be sent out. I can do comparision of the results from A and B.( to ensure B is developed correctly) and send results from A's processing. And if i need to retire A, i just cut of the provisions made earlier.

(2) seems initutive, but more importantly, have i missed out any critical gaps in my planning strategies?
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0