![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Expert-to-Expert. Learn advanced UNIX, UNIX commands, Linux, Operating Systems, System Administration, Programming, Shell, Shell Scripts, Solaris, Linux, HP-UX, AIX, OS X, BSD. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AIX 5.2 to 5.3 migration | Fred Vogel | AIX | 4 | 05-25-2008 10:58 PM |
| migration of sun box 5.8 to 5.10 | saini707 | SUN Solaris | 3 | 02-15-2008 10:04 AM |
| SAN migration | Hils | HP-UX | 0 | 06-17-2006 04:20 AM |
| AIX Migration | Student37 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 07-27-2005 03:33 PM |
| migration | omran | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 04-13-2003 12:38 PM |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Migration
Hi all,
Would appreciate advise on my situation. Currently server A is in production. Server A takes in data from Server X, does some processing and send to server Y. We are going to develop a different system in server B, something like an enhanced version of A. Server A will be retired once server B is commissioned. Server B is also required to take data from server X, does some processing and send to server Y. What strategy should i adopt? 1) Develop B as a standalone. However, when i conduct end to end testing for B, B must also send results to Y. But because Y is an external server, it cannot take in results from A and B. The data will be out of sync*. If i were to adopt this strategy, how can i seperate the results from A and B ? Meaning, how can i verify that B is crunching the data correctly, and successful sending to Y ( eg, comparision with data from A) and at the same time only trigger the results from A to Y? **** The reason that the data will be out of sync is because A may be sending 1 2 3,1,2,3 and B is sending 1,2,3. Something like an summary of A. Y is only interested in unique values, hence B is more optimal **** 2) Develop B and at the same time bring in A. That is, while developing B, make provisions to integrate A. Hence only one copy of the results will be sent out. I can do comparision of the results from A and B.( to ensure B is developed correctly) and send results from A's processing. And if i need to retire A, i just cut of the provisions made earlier. (2) seems initutive, but more importantly, have i missed out any critical gaps in my planning strategies? |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|