The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Top Forums > UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
Google UNIX.COM


UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Advanced UNIX and Linux questions go here. Expert-to-Expert.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SHLIB_PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH vasanthan HP-UX 3 05-21-2008 04:49 AM
Difference between LIB_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH shafi2all UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 1 05-09-2008 05:14 AM
Difference between LIB_PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH shafi2all UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 0 05-09-2008 04:30 AM
Ld_library_path ccp UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 1 03-18-2008 11:11 AM
Bash LD_LIBRARY_PATH? bysonary UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 1 04-18-2007 12:08 PM

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2006
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3
Stumble this Post!
Question cc, setuid, and LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Hi,

This question deals with Solaris 2.8 and setuid programs. From research I've done so far, setuid programs ignore LD_LIBRARY_PATH; I've proven this and am OK with it. The thing I am not certain of how the C compiler is supposed to behave when it is invoked via a setuid program. Basically, we have the following design:

- developers call a program which is actually a softlink
- the softlink points to a setuid program (compiled C wrapper)
- the wrapper calls a shell script which performs code compilation (Oracle Pro*C)

We were faced with the following error (produced by the shell script):

cc -xO3 -Xa -xstrconst -dalign -xF -errtags=yes -v -xarch=v9 -xchip=ultra2 -DSS_64BIT_SERVER -DBIT64 -DMACHINE64 -KPIC -errtags=yes -erroff=E_NO_IMPLICIT_DECL_ALLOWED,E_OLD_STYLE_DECL_OR_BAD_TYPE,E_FUNC_HAS_NO_RETURN_STMT -I. -I/u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/precomp/public -I/u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/rdbms/public
-I/u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/plsql/public -I/u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/network/public -DSLMXMX_ENABLE -DSLTS_ENABLE -D_REENTRANT -c validate_depex_tree.c
ld.so.1: acomp: fatal: lib_I_dbg_gen.so: open failed: No such file or directory
cc: Fatal error in /opt/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/acomp : Killed

From a previous experience with HP-UX 11, I assumed that the setuid piece may be causing LD_LIBRARY_PATH (even the default used by cc) to be ignored. So I modified the shell script to include the three default library directories (one of which does contain lib_I_dbg_gen.so) using the '-L' compiler option. But same result. I had read somewhere (Google) that even though LD_LIBRARY_PATH is ignored for setuid programs, library directories explicitly added to the cc command-line would be used; but this does not appear to be the case.

Does anyone have any ideas???

P.S. The reason this doesn't work now is because the entire application is being migrated from HP-UX 10.20 (where it did work) to Solaris 2.8.
Reply With Quote
Google The UNIX and Linux Forums
Forum Sponsor
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:07 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2008 The CEP Blog All Rights Reserved -Ad Management by RedTyger Visit The Global Fact Book

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0