The UNIX and Linux Forums  

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Top Forums > UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users
.
google unix.com



UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users Expert-to-Expert. Learn advanced UNIX, UNIX commands, Linux, Operating Systems, System Administration, Programming, Shell, Shell Scripts, Solaris, Linux, HP-UX, AIX, OS X, BSD.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
option followed by : taking next option if argument missing with getopts gurukottur Shell Programming and Scripting 2 03-17-2008 12:46 PM
Netmask change online Maillot Jaune IP Networking 1 11-28-2006 08:44 AM
script for netmask check rhacodactylus Shell Programming and Scripting 2 08-17-2005 11:27 AM
Netmask markdr011 IP Networking 2 11-23-2004 10:06 AM
/etc/exports yls177 UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 1 11-05-2002 11:27 PM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Bulgarian Greek Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-22-2005
progressdll progressdll is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 44
nfs exports and netmask option

Setting up nfs on a redhat ES 4 gives me following issue that i
can't explain.

My nfs was working perfect whith following /etc/exports on the server

/home/test/nfstest 198.9.200.227(rw,sync,no_root_squash)

But after a powerloss and restart of the server it only works with the following.

/home/test/nfstest 198.9.200.227/24(rw,sync,no_root_squash)

I also had to remove the mount on the client it was giving rubbish.
The client was not down.

if i don't add the /24 netmask option i get following error

exportfs: No host name given with
/home/test/nfstest(rw,no_root_squash)
(ro,async,wdelay,hide,secure,root_squash,no_all_squash,subtree_check,secure_locks,mapping=identity,a nonuid=-2,anongid=-2),
suggest
*(ro,async,wdelay,hide,secure,root_squash,no_all_squash,subtree_check,secure_locks,mapping=identity, anonuid=-2,anongid=-2)
to avoid warning

So my question is. Why do i suddenly need to add the netmask option. I am sure it was not there before before the powerloss
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0