The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Operating Systems > SUN Solaris
.
google unix.com



SUN Solaris The Solaris Operating System, usually known simply as Solaris, is a free Unix-based operating system introduced by Sun Microsystems .

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Performance Reporting for the Solaris OS including Zones & Containers iBot Solaris BigAdmin RSS 0 09-24-2008 01:10 PM
solaris containers/zones reboot order jabberwocky SUN Solaris 3 08-07-2008 11:58 PM
Clustering Solaris Zones/Containers trouphaz SUN Solaris 8 04-21-2008 03:10 PM
Raid containers and filesystems falklandtim SCO 1 10-13-2005 05:34 PM
GRID containers technology dheram AIX 1 07-25-2005 10:42 AM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Bulgarian Greek Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2008
upengan78 upengan78 is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 142
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupp View Post
can these development boxes be solaris 10 or do they have to solaris 8?
Yes, they can be solaris 10, but how and where can I make use of solaris 10 ?

Thank you all for your replies !

I forgot something to mention but being this an internal network, users use rlogin instead of ssh, I guess that should also be configurable in containers..

Thanks
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2008
jlliagre jlliagre is offline Forum Advisor  
ɹǝsn sıɹɐlosuǝdo
  
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by upengan78 View Post
Yes, they can be solaris 10, but how and where can I make use of solaris 10 ?
You can obviously use Solaris 10 in Solaris 10 zones and it is certainly the recommended way. Solaris 8 zones are there to smooth migration but you should eventually run native Solaris 10 zones.
Quote:
I forgot something to mention but being this an internal network, users use rlogin instead of ssh, I guess that should also be configurable in containers..
Nothing to configure. The Solaris 8 zones being clones of your previous independant servers, they will behave the same and implement the same services.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2008
pupp's Avatar
pupp pupp is offline Forum Staff  
cap_10hdx 1
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 553
i highly suggest you take a look at the documentation for zones under docs.sun.com.

the setup of zones is very easy. however, you do need to plan. resources will be shared (mem, cpu, disk) so this is something to consider. also, you will essentially be running 5 servers (with your current setup) on one physical machine. hardware issues could bring your dev team to a halt. you may consider an upgrade from the v240 you have. if you have a spare box, do some testing. work out your kinks and find what fits for you before you roll it out to production. i've found happy clients (programmers) make for a better day for an admin!

i have done this many times and it has worked beautifully.

telnet,rlogin,rsh shouldn't matter as long as you are within your intranet. we are a major financial institution and use those as well... but we are also behind several layers of firewalls
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2008
upengan78 upengan78 is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlliagre View Post
You can obviously use Solaris 10 in Solaris 10 zones and it is certainly the recommended way. Solaris 8 zones are there to smooth migration but you should eventually run native Solaris 10 zones.

Nothing to configure. The Solaris 8 zones being clones of your previous independant servers, they will behave the same and implement the same services.
Thanks jlliagre for this information.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2008
avronius avronius is offline VIP Member  
VIP Member
  
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 305
I believe that the v240 should be more than sufficient to replace 4 Ultra 5/10s.

You've indicated that your developers are using mpich - you need to be careful that you aren't making their job more difficult.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2008
upengan78 upengan78 is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by avronius View Post
I believe that the v240 should be more than sufficient to replace 4 Ultra 5/10s.

You've indicated that your developers are using mpich - you need to be careful that you aren't making their job more difficult.
Correct, if I could mount the nfs and nis/rlogin working in zones/containers, all I expect is good working environment for users.

Currently the Work stations have 256M or 128M each and users never complained about amount of memory but disk space getting full made ssh /rlogin connections not working/ programs stopped working...

Thanks for your input, even I feel I could give it a try on v240, I feel like it is currently under utilized.. here is current status from top

Quote:
last pid: 20327; load avg: 0.03, 0.02, 0.02; up 294+19:31:10 11:46:31
75 processes: 66 sleeping, 1 zombie, 7 stopped, 1 on cpu
CPU states: 98.9% idle, 0.0% user, 1.1% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 8192M phys mem, 4151M free mem, 4005M swap, 4005M free swap
Quote:

ps -eo pmem,pcpu,rss,vsz,args | sort -k 1 -r | more
%MEM %CPU RSS VSZ COMMAND
4.1 0.0 336432 384496 /opt/VRTSralus/bin/beremote
3.2 0.0 255712 324800 /opt/VRTSralus/bin/beremote
1.3 0.0 100584 180664 /usr/java/bin/java -Xmx128m -Dsun.security.key.serial.interop=true -Djava.secur
0.6 0.0 48576 68120 /usr/lib/nfs/nfsmapid
0.2 0.0 9256 10232 /lib/svc/bin/svc.configd
0.2 0.0 10952 15040 /usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmd
0.1 0.1 2456 6240 /usr/lib/netsvc/yp/ypserv -d
0.1 0.0 9080 10728 /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd
0.1 0.0 5576 13584 /opt/csw/sbin/sshd -R
0.1 0.0 5384 13384 /opt/csw/sbin/sshd -R
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-10-2008
pupp's Avatar
pupp pupp is offline Forum Staff  
cap_10hdx 1
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 553
under-utilized for sure.

avronius - i'm looking at it from a hardware prospective. there are some SPoF issues to deal with. cpu, disks etc... an older model of v240 could pose further issues. i agree that the machine can handle zones just fine. again, just looking at it from hardware.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0