![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| SUN Solaris The Solaris Operating System, usually known simply as Solaris, is a free Unix-based operating system introduced by Sun Microsystems . |
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IPMP failover: Why is it occurring? | dangral | SUN Solaris | 3 | 06-05-2008 08:19 AM |
| solaris multipathing | simquest | SUN Solaris | 4 | 03-20-2008 12:06 PM |
| Linux Multipathing Enhancement | rajaryan99 | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 1 | 01-16-2008 07:16 AM |
| Strange Multipathing problem | tjlst15 | SUN Solaris | 3 | 09-13-2005 03:31 PM |
| Quick Poll: Solaris IP Multipathing | kduffin | IP Networking | 3 | 12-05-2003 09:16 AM |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, I have never done this, so cannot really comment on whether it will work well or not. Perhaps reborg (or someone with more knowledge about this than me) can comment?
|
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
servername-e1000g4-ipmp netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast + group mnb -failover deprecated up i.e. instead of above use : servername-e1000g4-ipmp netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast + group mnb -failover standby up in /etc/hostname.e1000g4 ! and /etc/hostname.e1000g0 remains as in quote. Last edited by upengan78; 06-10-2008 at 09:18 AM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
IPv4 test addresses should not be placed in the DNS and NIS name service tables What is the reason for above and if I am not wrong test address are servername-e1000g4-ipmp* right ?(in above example) what will happen if we add R-Records for these test IPS/Hostnames in DNS ? well ofcourse they will get resolved but what wrong will it do ? Thanks |
|||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |