The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Operating Systems > SUN Solaris
.
google unix.com



SUN Solaris The Solaris Operating System, usually known simply as Solaris, is a free Unix-based operating system introduced by Sun Microsystems .

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bonding lacp and link aggregation jaredo IP Networking 1 04-21-2008 05:43 PM
need some info about symbolic link and hard link detective linux UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 01-08-2008 07:36 AM
Complex Event Processing and FX market aggregation iBot Complex Event Processing RSS News 0 07-02-2007 01:52 AM
Link Aggregation and LACP hcclnoodles UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 1 04-06-2007 06:45 AM
Difference between hard link and soft link in unix RAJACHOKALINGAM UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 08-01-2006 04:10 AM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
hcclnoodles hcclnoodles is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 272
Link Aggregation

Hi there

I have a requirement to provide failover to our customer boxes in case of interface / switch failure, I have been looking at Solaris Link Aggregation with LACP and I wanted to ask a question

Ive seen multiple websites that say the following

Quote:
You cannot use link aggregation if you are using two separate switches. As per IEEE 802.3ad, an aggregation connects two end-points. Some switch vendors implement their own extensions which allows a single "logical" aggregation to span multiple switches, but these solutions are not yet common and don't always explicitly
support 802.3ad.
Does this also mean that if the switches are trunked together that you still cant use 2 switches ??. One absolute requirement of this project is that I use 2 seperate switches, so if this isnt possible, then Ill have to look into IPMP or something else

Any help would be greatly appreciated
Gary
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
Perderabo's Avatar
Perderabo Perderabo is offline Forum Staff  
Unix Daemon
  
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ashburn, Virginia
Posts: 9,111
I have never tried that, but I would expect it work. The adjective "separate" would not apply to trunked switches. If you try it, let us know if it works and which protocol was used to trunk the switches.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2007
stdout stdout is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 103
hello,

that is a wrong solution.
you want to provide a failover link - but you suggest a link or port aggregation.
those 2 are very different.
-- do read/google more about these 2.

if you dont want to waste your time :
- 2 server NICs into 1 or 2 switches.
- put different IP in the same subnet (or in 1 VLAN).

or :

- 2 server NICs into 2 switch.
- put different IP in different subnets (or in 2 VLANs).

done.

cheers...

Last edited by stdout; 04-06-2007 at 04:50 AM..
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0