![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| SUN Solaris The Solaris Operating System, usually known simply as Solaris, is a free Unix-based operating system introduced by Sun Microsystems . |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Out of Memory" after reboot for only Tuxedo DB servers on AIX 5.3 | swvahokie | AIX | 3 | 05-12-2008 11:46 AM |
| best or recommended unix os for new user | Siten0308 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 0 | 04-02-2007 05:21 PM |
| Unix recommended reading | vedder191 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 02-27-2005 05:34 AM |
| Any recommended book on Unix & Shell Programming | endeavour1985 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 7 | 01-28-2005 06:01 AM |
| Reboot the Unix work station | mohsen | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 5 | 07-09-2001 10:31 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
Reboot of Unix servers - recommended?
Hello,
Please can anyone tell me - is it true that you should not re-boot Unix Sun Solaris servers on a regular basis, but onyl do it when really required? We want to schedule a reboot on a daily basis, to clear any rogue processes, but have been told this is not a good idea. Can anyone advise? Thanks, Paula |
|
||||
|
Indeed, you do not boot Unix systems unless there is a valid reason to do so.
Unix isn't Windows which messes up memory etc. all the time. And booting a system just to kill processes isn't a very good reason. Processes should terminate in a "normal" way. If they don't you better talk to the developer and kill them manually when ever the need occurs. |
|
||||
|
i agree
I agree with Perderabo....it is all based on requirement of course.
If the need is there, then it has to be done, but 4 months - 6 months is a decent average time frame. However I have noticed that most reboots are done because patches need to go on or more external disk needs to be configured. I know for sure in certain financial firms, they reboot boxes every week....over 10,000 a week. so it really is dependent on environment. -S |
|
||||
|
I'm working on rolling our the lastest updates for Solaris and AIX to address the daylight savings time changes. In our environment we don't reboot on a schedule. Many machines have been up 200+ days, and probably 20% or more have been up over 400 days. We've even seen one 900+ and one 1500+ uptime.
There is a very strong correlation between how long the box has been up and how likely it is something will go wrong with our update process or the reboot at the end of it. If a server has been up for hundreds of days it will be downlevel on many more patches (and farther downlevel at that). Additionally there's more time for minor problems that go unnoticed in day-to-day use to build up. Between those two factors, you are really playing with fire leaving a box up forever. Of all the places I worked my favorite policy was one where database servers were rebooted every 90 days, everything else 120 days. That seemed to be a good balance point where you weren't having too much extra work but still had fairly fresh servers. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| linux |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|