The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Operating Systems > SUN Solaris
.
google unix.com



SUN Solaris The Solaris Operating System, usually known simply as Solaris, is a free Unix-based operating system introduced by Sun Microsystems .

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AIX core dumps bean66 High Level Programming 4 08-08-2008 06:42 PM
SCO 5.07 Panic / Core Dumps ccarcher SCO 5 01-19-2007 05:12 AM
strcmp core dumps annie High Level Programming 6 02-26-2006 10:23 AM
Generating core dumps handak9 SUN Solaris 4 09-08-2004 04:07 AM
reading core dumps suntan UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 2 04-23-2003 09:29 PM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2009
pupp's Avatar
pupp pupp is offline Forum Staff  
cap_10hdx 1
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 548
core dumps

i had a situation where a process was defunct. preap would not reap the process and gcore would not work properly (not sure why). therefore, the suggestion was to force a panic and collect the core dump. obviously you could do a savecore -L and capture the dump without bringing down the system. However, I do realize that ram is still dynamic at that point and savecore does its best to capture the core at that time. half/reboot -d would give a much more accurate picture in the sense of time when savecore is ran.

my question is do you really see or can you see a big difference in the core dump doing say a reboot -d instead of savecore -L ?
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2009
jlliagre jlliagre is offline Forum Advisor  
ɹǝsn sıɹɐlosuǝdo
  
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,382
gcore cannot work with a defunct process given the fact a dead process has nothing left in memory of its own.
Bits Awarded / Charged to jlliagre for this Post
Date User Comment Amount
05-21-2009 candlejack Good explanation 1,000
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2009
pupp's Avatar
pupp pupp is offline Forum Staff  
cap_10hdx 1
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 548
good point. so even though the process is still in the process-table, all memory should have been cleared out for this process?
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-21-2009
jlliagre jlliagre is offline Forum Advisor  
ɹǝsn sıɹɐlosuǝdo
  
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,382
Indeed.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
core, core dump, crash, defunct processes, dump, gcore, halt, panic, preap, reboot, savecore, solaris 10, sun

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0