IPv6 question


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Solaris IPv6 question
# 8  
Old 06-26-2014
How about:

Code:
/etc/defaultrouter6

as in "router" with 'r' at the end.

Even so, try creating it and see what happens.
Can always remove it if it doesn't work.

---------- Post updated at 08:05 PM ---------- Previous update was at 08:02 PM ----------

And when you say that you can't ping your router, how are you doing that?

By ip address or by name? If by name, that would need successful resolution. Does the name appear in /etc/inet/hosts?

Last edited by hicksd8; 06-26-2014 at 04:23 PM..
# 9  
Old 06-27-2014
I have added /etc/defaultrouter6 and it does not do anything to get rid of my additional igb:2, igb:3 interfaces. However, this does not break anything. I am able still able to ping myself and the gateway. I am pinging the addresses via IP address.

---------- Post updated at 09:44 AM ---------- Previous update was at 08:22 AM ----------

I just realized this might help provide some more information. I am tyring to get this to work on a non global zone running solaris 10. My production server that "works" that I have been comparing against is a xen instance of Solaris 10 virutal machine running on a Oracle Linux server. Maybe my issue is something related to global and non global zones. At this time I do not have the global zone configured with IPv6 at all. I am going to configure it and report back.
# 10  
Old 06-27-2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by hicksd8
hostname.* files contain just the hostname that the system should be seen as on that particular interface.
Clarification - A /etc/hostname.<interface> file can contain an IP address instead of a hostname.
# 11  
Old 06-28-2014
I've re-read the thread from the beginning and I think we need to ensure that the concepts are understood here to ensure that we're not missing the point(s).

To save me explaining (yes, I'm lazy) I'll provide a link:

Configuring a virtual interface in Solaris

Please post back any progress or lack of progress.
# 12  
Old 07-02-2014
First an update. I have figured out that one of the additional interfaces was due to an additional subnet being configured on the cisco router. When that was removed I only got one additional virtual interface igb1:2 when I reconfigured the interface. However that shows up as NOLOCAL, and according to the ifconfig man page thats a on-link subnet.

What is that and what is it used for? I am assuming it is has something to do with the link local address but what and why? I dont see anywhere that states what the purpose of that NOLOCAL or on-link subnet serves. Below is my current ifconfig when restarting /network/physical.
Code:
ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 
igb1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet x.y.10.41 netmask ffffff00 broadcast x.y.10.255
ether 0:21:28:c0:ad:2b 
igb1: flags=2000841<UP,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6> mtu 1500 index 2
inet6 fe80::221:28ff:fec0:ad2b/10 
ether 0:21:28:c0:ad:2b 
igb1:1: flags=2000841<UP,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv6> mtu 1500 index 2
inet6 x:y:z:2302::41/64 
igb1:2: flags=20a0841<UP,RUNNING,MULTICAST,NOLOCAL,ADDRCONF,IPv6> mtu 1500 index 2
inet6 subnet x:y:z:2302::/64

My next discovery is that the servers are connected to different devices. The "working" production server is using a McAfee firewall as its default route and the "nonworking/extra interface" server is using a cisco router as its default route.

The cisco router is set to supress all autoconfiguration for ipv6 and I believe that my /etc/inet/ndpd.conf is setup correctly to stop ipv6 autoconfiguration. So with that being said why does the server act differently when connect to the McAfee firewall? I was told that nothing was done special on the firewall for a configuration.

Last edited by Franklin52; 07-03-2014 at 12:39 PM.. Reason: Please use code tags
# 13  
Old 07-08-2014
It appears that in.ndpd by default creates an on-link prefix when it receives a Router Advertisement and it sees that StatelessAddrConf is set to false in ndpd.conf. The only way to prevent the on-link prefix from being created is to disable the network/ndp service.

So it is acting as intended.
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

8 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Solaris 10 IPv6

Hello Dears , please I need your support I have Oracle Solaris 10 X86 server please if you can advise how can I add IP v6 on my server and if IPv6 was disabled how can i enable it also how can i add two IP (v4 and v6) on the same interface or I have to add another interface . Thanks in... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ttashman
1 Replies

2. IP Networking

IPv6 Problems

I am trying to setup an IPv6 network. I modified the interfaces file: /etc/network/interfaces # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface etho0 inet static address 2620:7:a000::1 netmask 64 gateway ::ffff:c0a8:101 ... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Meow613
0 Replies

3. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

Assigning ipv6 to bonding interface - getting old as well as changed ipv6 in ifconfig output

Hi, I have created a bonding bond1 interface with 6 Eth , mode=4. Recently i have changed my old ipv6 to new one and tried to restart as well as reload network service. Post which i can see old as well as changed ipv6 in ifconfig command output. Below are few files and command output for your... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: omkar.jadhav
1 Replies

4. HP-UX

Ipv6 on hpux

my problem: i want to change from ipv4 to ipv6 on my home network. On hpux i can assign only address non routable as fe80::1 fe80::3 etc to my lan0 Editing netconf-ipv6 i can assing a routable ipv6 address like fd55:282f:3b98::/48 or 2001:470:26:307:89a0:aba1:f98b:eb3e but only to alias... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: Linusolaradm1
0 Replies

5. Red Hat

IPv4 and IPv6 Related Question to CentOS VMs

Hello, I was wondering if it would be possible to run two VMs one with services for IPv4 and the other one with services for IPv6. The main physical system would be connected to a IPv6 switch. I think it should be fine but I would like to hear out your comments. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: svalenciatech
1 Replies

6. Linux

ipv6 routing

I am trying to capture the ipv6 packets through pcap utility. For that i am redirecting the ipv6 packets to the loopback address , but the ipv6 packets are not getting redirected to tha loopback address.Instead they are taking there normal routes. (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: vikasmca05
1 Replies

7. IP Networking

IPv6 testbed

Hello guyz.. did some of u have implement or making a testbed for IPv6? if yes, can u attached the procedures and standard guidelines because i really need for my proposal.. thanx.. (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: unknown2205
2 Replies

8. IP Networking

Solaris IPv6

Hi, Anybody who worked with IPv6 on Solaris 8. I want to get rid of IPv6 (Uninstall). Any comments ...ideas...will be highly appreciated. (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: s_aamir
4 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question