Solaris 9 ndd -set issues


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Operating Systems Solaris Solaris 9 ndd -set issues
# 8  
Old 07-04-2013
your initial sample showed you have /dev/ce0 --- edit /kernel/drv/bge0.conf and set everything to 0 except for *1000fdx_cap ... if you cannot reboot your server, reset all the other capabilities off with ndd -set as listed below ... if that still does not work, have your network folks set to 1000/full the actual port speed and duplex on the switch port the affected server's cable connects to ... changing the cable will not do anything unless somebody actually dropped something on it when they changed the switches ...
Code:
ndd -set /dev/bge0 adv_1000fdx_cap 1
ndd -set /dev/bge0 adv_1000hdx_cap 0
ndd -set /dev/bge0 adv_autoneg_cap 0
ndd -set /dev/bge0 autoneg_cap 0
ndd -set /dev/bge0 1000fdx_cap 1

# 9  
Old 07-04-2013
Yes, that was what I meant. I meant bge0 instead of ce0.
My question still stands as to why the interface fails to auto negotiate to the allocated speeds.
The second interface beg1 is connected to the same switch and is running at full duplex 1000 speed.
But in the beg0 when I force switch to 1000 speeds full duplex the link goes down. Now I am believed to think that it is because of the switch.
I read some where that there is some problem with the Cisco switches and bge interfaces, that is causing the port to act this way.
Now I am thinking of switching the port to a different port in the same switch.
I don't know anything about switches nor do I know what to look for in a switch.
I guess changing to a different switch port is my best bet.
# 10  
Old 07-05-2013
Identify if it is a switch port issue or server issue first. If you have one server (A) running at the correct 1gb, and the other server(B) now running at 100mb, at the switch, swap server (A) cable to the switch port of server (B), and plug server(B) into the switch port server (A) was using. If it is a switch port miss-config, the problem will now move to the other server. If the same server still has the same issue, then you have at least eliminated it is a switch port issue.
# 11  
Old 07-10-2013
The issue has been resolved now. Apparently it was because of the configurations of the switch. I am not familiar with the switches and had been asking someone who was familiar with the switches to have a look. He did and changed the configurations on the switch. Speeds back up to 1000 Full Duplex now. Thank you guys for the continuous inputs.
This User Gave Thanks to br1an For This Post:
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

9 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Solaris

Ndd adv_autoneg_cap showing read only

Hi, Recently, I had to disable autoneg in one of my servers having ixgbe1 interface. While using below command I got "Permission denied" error: ndd -set /dev/ixgbe1 adv_autoneg_cap 0 On investigating further I found that adv_autoneg_cap is showing as read-only parameter. Although it is... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rochitsharma
1 Replies

2. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

nLocal sendmail issues when hostname not set in official domain name

Hi, I'm having issues with sendmail when I try to send host to host mail. I've had to change the "my official domain name" line to mycompany.com to get the mails through the external spam filter, when a mail was sent with hostname.mycompany.com it was blocked. I had to change the Dj macro... (0 Replies)
Discussion started by: elcounto
0 Replies

3. Solaris

Solaris 8 vs Solaris 10 compatibility issues !

Hello, I recently upgraded our system from Solaris 8 to 10. It seems couple of binaries crashed in the new server Solaris 10. Before digging too much on it , from theory it sounds like any binary that is built on Solaris 8 (using gmake) is supposed to be compatible with Solaris 10 , right ? ... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: sudsa
1 Replies

4. Solaris

ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_host_param

Following command was set up in startup script on Solaris 8 servers - improved network transfers of files from one server to the another (doubled transfer speed). ndd -set /dev/tcp tcp_host_param '10.140.20.10 sendspace 279600 recvspace 279600 timestamp 1' Now they are getting a new server... (15 Replies)
Discussion started by: RTM
15 Replies

5. Solaris

ndd /dev/tcp help

Solaris 10 server (SunOS 5.10 Generic_137137_09) I have a services file configured in /etc in there windows clients connect to my server on port 6034-6037 when I do the following netstat | grep TestServices it pulls all the connections active for those ports so right now I have 10 clients... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: deaconf19
3 Replies

6. Solaris

ndd matters

Hi, I would like to know whether there is any config file that i can refer to for the result of 'ndd -get /dev/tcp tcp_time_wait_interval'? When i man 'ndd', there is one statement which is -> Each driver chooses which parameters to make visible using ndd. Does it answering my question above... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: honmin
3 Replies

7. Solaris

Questions related to ndd commands

Hello Gurus I would like to know more about ndd commands related to ethernet(NIC) like how to set link_status, link_speed & link_mode as I know how to check these value. And I also would like to know how to make these setting permanents after reboot as I know that these setting will vanish... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: amity
5 Replies

8. Solaris

ndd help

Hi Guys, I need help with ndd. I was going through network FAQ but i have more questions then answers regarding ndd. #ndd -set /dev/hme instance 0 #ndd -set /dev/hme adv_100fdx_cap 1 #ndd -set /dev/hme adv_100hdx_cap 0 #ndd -set /dev/hme adv_10fdx_cap 0 #ndd -set /dev/hme adv_10hdx_cap 0... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: nitinkgoud
2 Replies

9. IP Networking

ndd and le1

I am trying to set an interface to 100/Full, but the command I use are getting rejected. I think it is the last argument, but I don't know how to find the correct values. I am trying to use the following script, but change hme to le . echo "Setting hme interface 1: 100mb/full-duplex..." ... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: bbrandeb49
2 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question