The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Top Forums > Shell Programming and Scripting
.
google unix.com



Shell Programming and Scripting Post questions about KSH, CSH, SH, BASH, PERL, PHP, SED, AWK and OTHER shell scripts and shell scripting languages here.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Listing files with full path r_sethu UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 5 06-15-2009 02:56 AM
List files with full path mr_bold Shell Programming and Scripting 3 10-07-2008 12:19 PM
to find the file with full path surjyap Shell Programming and Scripting 5 01-18-2008 03:26 PM
Finding relative path of a file chiru_h Shell Programming and Scripting 4 04-16-2007 08:20 PM
vi - replacing a relative path with absolute path in a file Yinzer955i UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 09-07-2006 11:47 AM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2007
polypus polypus is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2
getting full path from relative path

given a relative path, how do i convert it into a full one. i.e. if i am in

/home/polypus

and i am given foo/bar then to get a full path i can just concatinate it with pwd, but what if i am given "../mama"

how do i programmatically convert:

/home/polypus and ../mama into /home/mama

in a way that will always work no matter what relative path is passed?

my first thought is to just cd to the directory and set a variable

cd $rev_path
full_path=`pwd`
cd $original_dir

it seems there must be a unix command which does this more elegantly?

thanks
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2007
jim mcnamara jim mcnamara is offline Forum Staff  
...@...
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 5,643
This is why relative paths have problems sometimes. There isn't a good way to handle absolutely any relative path, because all relative paths have an assumption:

the current working directory is "x".

You are assuming /home/polypus. Unix tools are designed to do one thing very well. It's hard to make a bulletproof tool because of the cwd assumption.

Because:
Obviously it may not be true.

So, there is no really elegant way to deal with it. You're onto one way to deal with it.
For programming, you should consider avoiding relative paths unless you want the code to work if and only if it runs from a certain directory.
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2007
Perderabo's Avatar
Perderabo Perderabo is offline Forum Staff  
Unix Daemon
  
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ashburn, Virginia
Posts: 9,100
Suppose that I don't have room in /usr for /usr/local but I do have some room in /export. So I make a directory called /export/usr.local and it has a subdirectory called bin. And I do a "ln -s /export/usr.local /usr/local". Now I do a "cd /usr/local" then I do a "cd bin". At this point my view is that I am in /usr/local/bin and a shell with a built-in pwd command may return that path. But /usr/bin/pwd will return /export/usr.local/bin. With more symbolic links in a path, there can be more aliases like this. The value returned by /usr/bin/pwd is the physical path. With good permissions on each directory leading to the current directory, /usr/bin/pwd can return the physical path. A built-in pwd in the same shell that navigated to the current directory may be able to return the particular logical path used to arrive at the current directory. Finding all logical paths to a particular directory would be rather daunting.

Writing a program like /usr/bin/pwd is not very easy in unix. You can stat the . directory to get the inode of the current directory. Then you can open .. and stat each file in the parent directory until you find the same inode. You walk up the chain one .. at a time repeating this process until . and .. are the same inode which means you have reached /. (Actually it is harder than that because you might traverse a mount point.) This is why putting an NFS mounted filesystem in / is very unwise... every /usr/bin/pwd must contact the NFS server to perform the stat.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2007
vgersh99's Avatar
vgersh99 vgersh99 is online now Forum Staff  
Moderator
  
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 5,116
not a 'silver bullet', but.....
Code:
#!/bin/ksh

thisFILE=$(whence ${0})
echo "here is my absolute pathname: [${thisFILE}]"
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2007
polypus polypus is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2
thanks

thanks guys for explanations and help
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language translation by Google.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0