|
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Shell Programming and Scripting Post questions about KSH, CSH, SH, BASH, PERL, PHP, SED, AWK and OTHER shell scripts and shell scripting languages here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Internet Access Control | fruiz | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 06-23-2008 12:33 PM |
| Does U*X have Access Control Lists? | siegfried | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 05-05-2008 04:52 PM |
| FTP access & control question | Katkota | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 12-21-2007 10:23 AM |
| Command for access control list | manoj.solaris | SUN Solaris | 1 | 08-09-2007 07:03 PM |
| Access Control | zertoir | Filesystems, Disks and Memory | 1 | 09-24-2003 12:32 PM |
Powered by 
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
01-23-2007
|
||||
|
||||
|
Access Control List
Hey all, I have a directory (own by user: b; group: grpB) which I want a user (user: a; group: grpA) to be able to read and execute from, I wonder if I should add user a to this particular directory's ACL or that I would add group grpB to user a's subgroup?
I would like to know the difference or exact when to use which option on this situation? I am quite confused by these concept. Thanks in advance! |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode
