shell magic number with a -

vino · #1 (**permalink**) 07-08-2005

In one of our internal scripts (unix.run), I have noticed that the following shebang.

Code:

#!/bin/sh -
for i in test1 test2 test3 ; do
.
.
.

Any idea what the - in the magic number stands for ?

And what impact does it have on the script ?

Continuing on the same script, I have the following for unix.run

Code:

ls -l unix.run
-rw-------    1 XXXXXX g900          187 Jul  8 04:29 unix.run

If I do a

Code:

./unix.run

it says 'Permission denied'

But if I run it as,

Code:

sh unix.run

it works well.

Why the difference in behaviour between ./unix.run and sh unix.run?

Shouldn't it always say 'Permision denied' in both the cases ?

Any inputs/pointers on these two points, highly appreciated.

Thanks,
Vino

blowtorch · #2 (**permalink**) 07-08-2005

To answer the first question, this is to disable the option processing by sh. This means that if you pass any arguments to the script, sh will not try to interpret them itself, but will treat them as arguments.

To quote the BSD sh manual,

Quote:

Originally Posted by BSD sh manual

A ``--'' or plain ``-'' will stop option processing and will
force the remaining words on the command line to be treated as arguments.

In the case of your second question, the script does not run as './unix.run' because you are trying to 'execute' a file that is not executable (no x bits are set). With 'sh ./unix.run' the binary '/usr/bin/sh' is executed and the unix.run script is passed to it as arguments.

Cheers!

P.S. BTW, the magic number only comprises the first 2 or 3 (both are legal) bytes in the file. The rest of the line tells the kernel what is to be used to interpret the rest of the file.

Perderabo · #3 (**permalink**) 07-08-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by blowtorch

P.S. BTW, the magic number only comprises the first 2 or 3 (both are legal) bytes in the file. The rest of the line tells the kernel what is to be used to interpret the rest of the file.

What os? HP-UX magic man page says:

Code:

struct magic_number { 
    unsigned short    system_id; 
    unsigned short    file_type; 
}; 
typedef      struct    magic_number MAGIC;

blowtorch · #4 (**permalink**) 07-08-2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by blowtorch

P.S. BTW, the magic number only comprises the first 2 or 3 (both are legal) bytes in the file. The rest of the line tells the kernel what is to be used to interpret the rest of the file.

Oops! Thats 3 or 4! Its there in the reply by Perderabo in the FAQs.

Thanks for pointing that out Perderabo.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Bad magic number on /dev/md0	ravinandan	UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users	0	08-17-2007 07:56 AM
LVM magic number 0x4D48	ghimanshu	Filesystems, Disks and Memory	2	07-18-2007 08:27 AM
Bad Magic Number	wesweshahaha	Filesystems, Disks and Memory	0	05-18-2006 01:28 PM
Bad magic number	batosai	SUN Solaris	1	04-22-2006 11:29 AM
bad magic number	rein	UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users	5	01-05-2005 11:27 AM

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread: