![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Shell Programming and Scripting Post questions about KSH, CSH, SH, BASH, PERL, PHP, SED, AWK and OTHER shell scripts and shell scripting languages here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| perl folder list with "..", without ".". | jimmy_y | Shell Programming and Scripting | 6 | 07-07-2009 09:25 PM |
| ERROR: more than one instance of overloaded function "vprintf" has "C" linkage | donatoll | HP-UX | 0 | 10-14-2008 05:35 AM |
| Development Releases: Linux Mint 4.0 Beta "Fluxbox", 4.0 Alpha "Debian" | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 01-04-2008 03:00 PM |
| Explain the line "mn_code=`env|grep "..mn"|awk -F"=" '{print $2}'`" | Lokesha | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 4 | 12-20-2007 01:52 AM |
| No utpmx entry: you must exec "login" from lowest level "shell" | peterpan | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 0 | 01-18-2006 04:15 AM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
There is no major difference in semantics - the innermost control block wherein the last keyword executes, is "broken out of": for and while blocks. This is logically identical to a goto in C that points to the first line of code outside a control block.
All of the variables - if they have scope outside of the control block, remain as they were when last is encountered. last does not imply a return from a sub. Unlike C's break, last is not required in a switch control block. And do remember, nobody posting here is required to give any answers at all. Try perlmonks if this does not answer your question. We have serveral major perlers here who also may take this further. |
|
||||
|
Well he's also not required to be an a-hole, especially when it's the result of him not paying attention to what I was asking, and I have seen other threads where his/his contribution to the thread is basically a "RTFM" meanwhile the bits accrue.
your response does answer my question though, so I thank you for your time. Last edited by thmnetwork; 1 Week Ago at 12:07 AM.. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|