![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Security Anything involving computer security goes here. |
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Microsoft Security Advisory (910550): Macromedia Security Bulletin: MPSB05-07 Flash P | iBot | Security Advisories (RSS) - Microsoft | 0 | 04-06-2008 01:50 AM |
| Microsoft Security Advisory (910550): Macromedia Security Bulletin: MPSB05-07 Flash P | iBot | Security Advisories (RSS) - Microsoft | 0 | 12-24-2007 06:00 AM |
| Mandriva Linux Security Update Advisory - gdm (MDKSA-2007:169) - Help Net Security | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 08-22-2007 04:10 AM |
| Trustix Secure Linux Security Advisory - bind, clamav, curl ... - Help Net Security | iBot | UNIX and Linux RSS News | 0 | 07-30-2007 03:40 AM |
| disabled telnet now need port 23 or port 22 | panzerkw | SUN Solaris | 3 | 03-05-2007 11:08 AM |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
port security
i have a question related to iptables,
which one is better, blocking the ports one by one, or using one command to block them all ? like from what ive read usually when configuring a firewall everything should be dropped and then allowing the ports needed. so does that do the job or its better to block them one by one ? |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|