The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > Security
.
google unix.com



Security Discuss UNIX and Linux computer and network security, cybersecurity, cyberattacks, IT security, CISSP, OWASP and more.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
properties for vi shriashishpatil UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 04-20-2007 02:27 PM
Unable to use funtion keys with Kea term Rdavila SCO 1 05-05-2004 10:18 AM
compile funtion sundarm High Level Programming 4 02-01-2002 11:01 AM
Directory properties trekker UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 8 11-20-2001 09:55 PM
Delete funtion Optimus_P Post Here to Contact Site Administrators and Moderators 2 07-30-2001 10:31 AM

 
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Bulgarian Greek Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2006
newkidintown newkidintown is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2
Hash Funtion properties

Here are some desirable properties for cryptographic hash functions:

These properties below are generally considered prerequisites:

* Preimage resistant: given h it should be hard to find any m such that h = hash(m).
* Second preimage resistant: given an input m1, it should be hard to find another input, m2 (not equal to m1) such that hash(m1) = hash(m2).
* Collision-resistant: it should be hard to find two different messages m1 and m2 such that hash(m1) = hash(m2).

For each of the following applications of hash functions, explain which of these three properties are needed and which are not.


(a) Cryptographic signatures are produced by computing a hash of a message, then applying a signature function to the hash of the message. Suppose Eve has a list of messages m1,...mn, and their signatures computed using Bob's signing key, but does not have Bob's signing key. Assuming that the signature function is not susceptible to attack, it should not be possible for Eve to present Bob's signature on any message other than m1,...mn.

(b) Suppose that Eve works for a Certificate Authority. She does not have access to the special harware that computes digital signatures, but she knows the hash function. In addition, Eve can get messages signed, but every message that is signed automatically goes into a log file that Eve cannot change. Eve should not be able to produce a certificate signed by the Certificate Authority that does not appear in the log file.

Anybody can explain these to me?

thanks
Akhil
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0