The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > Security > IT Security RSS
.
google unix.com



More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debian: New policyd-weight packages fix insecure temporary files iBot Security Advisories (RSS) 0 03-27-2008 02:50 PM
Mandriva: Updated audacity package fixes insecure temporary iBot Security Advisories (RSS) 0 03-21-2008 01:50 PM
More command insecure odashe UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 2 05-26-2005 05:50 PM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2009
iBot's Avatar
iBot iBot is offline
Forum Robot Girl
  
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 22,135
The Insecure Air Freshener

At a recent trip to an office building, in the restroom there was, up in the corner, a battery-powered  air freshener that automatically sprays potpourri scent every half hour. It is a white box about the size of 2 stacked VHS tapes (remember those?) mounted up in the corner against crimson tile.  And it had, to my amazement, a brass lock to keep the lid securely closed.

The lock was a simple, inexpensive brass lock anyone can buy at Home Depot for a few bucks, screwed into the plastic side with standard gold-colored  screws. So, I was wondering...why was it locked? I don't know the history, nor do I deal with air fresheners often. I myself cannot think of a good reason for doing this. So I wanted to do some deconstruction of the impetus behind what I find to be a somewhat irrational act.

To set the stage, this bathroom is not located in a secure facility. It is a nondescript typical corporate office building in the suburbs. Therefore, the logic used for locking the device, as far as I can see, falls into one of two categories (or both):
  • Security: so no one can steal the air freshener can or batteries
  • Public safety: so no one can install a can of aerosol anthrax
And the lock down was probably facilitated by either:
  • An overzealous organizational security policy
  • An overzealous security officer
  • An overzealous custodial engineer
But again, perhaps this is a wise practice, to lock down air fresheners in corporate restrooms, and it's me who is being naive. I would hate to be the one who has to answer why I didn't lock down the air freshener after such an attack (or theft) occurred. If I do start to see this more, I may chalk it up to a weak economy, where people steal air freshener parts similarly to how thieves steal copper pipe and wire from homes in economically-depressed areas. But for now, I tend to see this as an irrational act of security, the result of watching too much local news and crime dramas.

Also, some concerns:
  • If someone who steals air freshener components is being allowed into the building, why and how?  What else is at risk?
  • The lock is cheap and easily compromised
  • Has equal attention been made to other possible vectors of whatever attack the lock was intended to prevent?
I guess the point is, if you're going to implement a security measure, make sure it is in response to a definitive requirement, that it is effective, and that you don't let it eclipse other threats and vulnerabilities that also need to be mitigated.




More...
Sponsored Links
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0