|
|||||||
| Forums | Search Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Man Pages | Albums | FAQ | Members | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Red Hat Red Hat is the world's leading open source technology solutions provider with offerings including Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Fedora, open source applications, security and systems management, virtualization, and Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) solutions. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello,
Our system on a Redhat platform is generating ZIP archives that we then send to another system on a Windows machine. I have no issue generating a ZIP file containing up to 2GB worth of data and 350k files, I can unzip all contents on the machine with no issue, however the remote system on Windows is using WinZip 17 to extract the files and it has a limitation of maximum 65k files in the ZIP. I am therefore exploring the possibility to send them a zipx archive instead, as they are convinced they would be able to handle this volume of files in this format, however I can't find anything on the internet showing zipx support for Redhat? I know zipx is quite a new format, but I´m surprised I can't find any library on the internet that I could test on my machine. Any advice? Thanks & Regards Yann |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
7zip on windows - free. Create a tar archive on RH. Zip the one archive.
Send it to windows. Unzip and then untar using 7zip. The unsigned short limit of 65K is an old zip issue. This is why people tar up large numbers of files, then zip just one tar archive. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I´ve already tried to gzip every indivual file, tar everything and send the single file. I´ve tried TGZ as well, but both "solutions" are time consuming. Otherwise I came up with the alternative to split the files into 50k "blocks" (thus flying under the limitation) and send multiple ZIP archives (between 1 and 6 basically in our case) but I actually think the solution is bad. EDIT: Is it a fair assumption to say that most businesses would opt for a solution involving TAR? Last edited by Indalecio; 02-14-2013 at 08:51 AM.. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
It depends on what software the businesses have available. I know I've had problems with GNU tar and large files on Windows systems.
7zip sounds like a good option to me, know for a fact it works well in UNIX and windows. |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And then our customer is trying to push us for WinZip despite the technical limitations because of their mindset towards open source and freeware software. So I´m kind of caught between the technical constraints and applications doing the job only partially (screaming for bad designs or workarounds). Anyway, I´ll give this a go. Thanks. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Add shared members from library to same library in a different directory | kneemoe | AIX | 5 | 08-25-2012 08:21 AM |
| /System/Library vs. /Library regarding Python Shell version | Alexander4444 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 02-27-2012 10:58 AM |
| ./configure problem for libsf library due to apparently missing libdb library. | vectrum | Linux | 4 | 08-05-2011 09:55 AM |
| Help on extracting file with zipx extension | mohan_xunil | Shell Programming and Scripting | 3 | 11-10-2009 07:55 PM |
| How to change a Makefile from building static library to shared library? | cpthk | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 08-26-2009 02:23 AM |
|
|