![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Red Hat Red Hat is the world's leading open source technology solutions provider with offerings including Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Fedora, open source applications, security and systems management, virtualization, and Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) solutions. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| spooling through shell script | ss_ss | Shell Programming and Scripting | 9 | 01-13-2009 11:14 AM |
| spooling | kripssmart | Shell Programming and Scripting | 4 | 06-18-2008 09:02 AM |
| Any way to direct print job to a non-standard port? | HVHS_CJR | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 0 | 05-08-2006 03:32 PM |
| Spooling a log file with timestamp | ukadmin | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 03-23-2004 09:06 AM |
| HP-UX lp spooling places | doeboy | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 04-10-2002 12:21 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
Print Spooling using raw port 9100
Hello all,
I need to setup a print server that listens on three separate network interfaces, and sends jobs to the corresponding print queue. Example: 192.168.69.100 - printer1 -> Out to 139.177.69.100:9100 192.168.69.101 - printer2 -> Out to 139.177.69.101:9100 192.168.69.102 - printer2 -> Out to 139.177.69 102:9100 Is there a way to have the printing system listen on a specific interface for a queue? Also can I have the queue listen on port 9100 and just spool the raw data to be sent on to the printer? The system I'm going to use is a RHEL5 system, but I can make it anything if I so desire. The issue deals with a client application that can't be touched and currently prints directly to an HP jetdirect server. We are moving some infrastructure and due to some security directives, I'm required to build this intermediate box to spool the data, rather than just routing these jobs through the firewalls. (I've already fought the logic on this and lost, so don't get me started again :-)) Any insight is appreciated. Shawn |
|
||||
|
Fixed my own issue
Found the solution to my problem, and thought I would post it in case I forget it and have to look it up again..
![]() Since the customer application was setup to print to 4 individual printers, using 4 different IP addresses, I had the network folks re-map the NATting to point to aliases created on my print queue box. So I created the network aliases on my primary interface, giving me: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:67:E9:85 inet addr:172.19.2.56 Bcast:172.19.2.63 Mask:255.255.255.224 inet6 addr: fe80::224:e8ff:fe67:e985/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:68965 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:77371 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:26198783 (24.9 MiB) TX bytes:35977262 (34.3 MiB) Interrupt:169 Memory:f8000000-f8012100 eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:67:E9:85 inet addr:172.19.2.57 Bcast:172.19.2.63 Mask:255.255.255.224 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:169 Memory:f8000000-f8012100 eth0:2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:67:E9:85 inet addr:172.19.2.58 Bcast:172.19.2.63 Mask:255.255.255.224 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:169 Memory:f8000000-f8012100 eth0:3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:67:E9:85 inet addr:172.19.2.59 Bcast:172.19.2.63 Mask:255.255.255.224 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:169 Memory:f8000000-f8012100 Next was to create the print queues and point them to the HP printers to be serviced. I called them 'printer1' 'printer2' and so on.. (I cheated and did this with Webmin): [root@ndh1-dmz-ptq ~]# lpstat -a printer1 accepting requests since Sat 07 Nov 2009 12:30:10 PM EST printer2 accepting requests since Sat 07 Nov 2009 12:30:14 PM EST printer3 accepting requests since Sat 07 Nov 2009 12:30:18 PM EST printer4 accepting requests since Sat 07 Nov 2009 12:30:22 PM EST [root@ndh1-dmz-ptq ~]# Verified the existence of the JetDirect service in /etc/services on port 9100: jetdirect 9100/tcp laserjet hplj # Installed xinetd on the RHEL 5 system and created a new file in /etc/xinetd.d/ for each print queue that I wanted to setup. Remember to change the name of the print queue and the IP address to be listened to using the BIND flag. This one is called /etc/xinetd.d/printer1: # Allow applications using the AppSocket / JetDirect protocol # to communicate with CUPS. service jetdirect { socket_type = stream protocol = tcp wait = no user = lp server = /usr/bin/lp server_args = -d printer1 -o raw groups = yes disable = no bind = 172.19.2.56 } Then I just created 3 more files (one for each printer), restarted xinetd: service xinetd restart And check netstat for listeners: netstat -a|more: Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State tcp 0 0 ndh1-dmz-ptq.:2208 *:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 172.19.2.59:jetdirect *:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 172.19.2.58:jetdirect *:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 172.19.2.57:jetdirect *:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 172.19.2.56:jetdirect *:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:sunrpc *:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:ndmp *:* LISTEN After this we just had to ensure all firewall rules allowed port 9100 traffic to flow in and out, and we were up and printing. Shawn |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|