sizeof an array of structure without using 'sizeof' operator


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Top Forums Programming sizeof an array of structure without using 'sizeof' operator
# 8  
Old 03-30-2009
Because the compiler's doing pointer arithmetic and the difference between 2 succesive pointers is 1. To get the size of any variable that is of that structure type it needs to be cast to an unsigned int...
Code:
/* size of any variable of that structure type */
s = (unsigned) &a[1] - (unsigned) &a[0];

/* size of the array will be */
100 * s;

# 9  
Old 03-30-2009
Cast it into an unsigned long instead. unsigned int will truncate a pointer on a lot of architectures.
# 10  
Old 03-30-2009
If you can do array operations on it like that, the compiler knows the size, so sizeof will work.

Code:
sizeof(a[0]) * 100

# 11  
Old 03-30-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corona688
Cast it into an unsigned long instead. unsigned int will truncate a pointer on a lot of architectures.
Only on compilers that are strictly 64-bit since they use the LP64 model. Majority of systems in use today are ILP32 so unsigned int is the same as unsigned long but for the sake of portability it should be unsigned long.

Last edited by shamrock; 03-30-2009 at 05:53 PM..
# 12  
Old 03-30-2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corona688
If you can do array operations on it like that, the compiler knows the size, so sizeof will work.

Code:
sizeof(a[0]) * 100

Well it was all about determining the size of an array of structures without using sizeof.
# 13  
Old 03-31-2009
Quote:
But if i try to subtract address of say &array[1] - &array[0] doesn't give the sizeof the array instead it gives 1 always. I just tried printing &array[1] and &array[0] which gives the address. When we subtract the address of begin and end variable it gives the number of bytes occupied between those two and why not in &array[1] - &array[0]. Kindly clarify.
This is because, compiler 'knows' type of array and it places instructions of pointer arithmetic using size of 'type'.

so &array[1] - &array[0] = number of elements of type of 'array' between &array[1] and &array[0]

Try this (char*)&array[1] - (char*)&array[0] or (unsigned long)(&array[1]) - (unsigned long)(&array[0])
# 14  
Old 03-31-2009
fine. thank you.
#include <stdio.h>

#pragma pack(1)

main()
{

char begin;
struct ptr
{
int a;
char b;
int *p;
}abc;
char end;

printf("Using sizeof operator = %u\n", sizeof(abc));

printf("Begin address = %u \n",&begin);
printf("end address = %u \n",&end);
printf("first element in struct address = %u \n",&abc.a);
printf("sizeof the structure = %u \n",(&begin > &end) ? (&begin - &end - 1) : (&end - &begin - 1));

}
The sizeof the structure using 'sizeof' operator is 9 as we are using #pragma pack(1)

But if you use the (&begin - &end - 1) logic the size is 15 which is wrong. It is because the
address of end variable is say 1245036
and the address of the first element in the structure is 1245040
and the begin variable address is 1245052
.

The first element of the structure is in the address which is a multiple of 4 and within structure we have a 'char' which is not padded and the int * starts immediately after that. but once it comes out of the structure again the 'begin' variable is in multiple of 4. Does it mean #pragma pack(1) packs only the variable inside the structure to avoid structure padding? if it is so then why when we declare
#include <stdio.h>
#pragma pack(1)
struct array
{
int a;
char c;
int d;
int e;
int f;
int h;
};

int main()
{
char begin;
struct array a[100];
char end;
printf("Size of structure = %u ", (&begin > &end) ? (&begin - &end - 1)/100 : (&end - &begin - 1)/100);
}

Here both sizeof operator and the program logic gives the same output 21 which is correct. Am not clear why it is not behaving properly in the below mentioned code. Could someone explain it to me?

main()
{

char begin;
struct ptr
{
int a;
char b;
int *p;
}abc;
char end;
Login or Register to Ask a Question

Previous Thread | Next Thread

10 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. Programming

Compiler/Runtime uses of sizeof

Ignoring other considerations for a moment and in general ... Would there be a difference in result (dot oh or execution) of: A. strncpy( a, b, sizeof(a) ); vs. B. c = sizeof(a); strncpy( a, b, c ); My general understanding is (at least I think my understanding is) that... (10 Replies)
Discussion started by: GSalisbury
10 Replies

2. Shell Programming and Scripting

Sizeof a file from directory path in perl

Hai how to find size of a file?? ex : /home/kiran/pdk/sample/calibre this is a path In that I have to find size of a files in side a calibre(it is the folder) like .results or .summary (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: kiran425
1 Replies

3. Programming

C Data Structure to represent a Sparse Array

Which data structure will be most appropriate to represent a sparse array? (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: rupeshkp728
1 Replies

4. Programming

structure pointer array as function parameters

if i create an array of pointers to a structure "struct node" as: struct node *r; and create "n" number of "linked lists" and assign it to the various struct pointers r using some function with a return type as structure pointer as: r=multiplty(.......) /*some parameters*/ is... (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: mscoder
2 Replies

5. Programming

sizeof(object) in C++

Hi, I have defined the class and call the sizeof(object to class) to get the size. # include <iostream> # include <iomanip> using namespace std; class sample { private: int i; float j; char k; public: sample() { } (2 Replies)
Discussion started by: ramkrix
2 Replies

6. Programming

Doubts regarding sizeof() operator

Hi, There are some bewildering sizeof() questions I have in my mind. Could anyone shed some light on this? int main() { printf("%d\n", sizeof(main)); // Ans: 1 } That is, the sizeof() a function identifier though it is treated internally as a pointer gives 1 byte always, why? ... (5 Replies)
Discussion started by: royalibrahim
5 Replies

7. Programming

How to get the sizeof char pointer

The below code throws the error, since the size of x = 19 is not passed to the cstrCopy function. using namespace std; static void cstrCopy(char *x, const char*y); int main () { char x; const string y = "UNIX FORUM"; cstrCopy(x,y.c_str()); return 0; } void cstrCopy(char *x,... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: SamRoj
3 Replies

8. Programming

Problem in static structure array in C

Hi, I have a following problem in C. I have a function A in which I used to call another function (function B) and pass an array of values through array variable by using below:- foo=functionB(array); In functionB, i used to just return some "values" (e.g return num;) in order to pass... (1 Reply)
Discussion started by: ahjiefreak
1 Replies

9. Programming

Search attributes in one structure using the values from another structure

Hello Groups I am trying to find out ways of comparing a value from a 'c' structure to a value in another 'C' structure. the 'C' structure can be a List or liked list as it contains lot many records. if we loop it in both the structures it is going to consume time. I am looking for a simple... (3 Replies)
Discussion started by: dhanamurthy
3 Replies

10. Programming

sizeof

we know that sizeof never returns zero when used with structure then why in this case it is returning zero struct foo { char c; }; void main() { struct foo f; cout<<sizeof(f); } i am working on solaris 5.8 isn't the above function should return the size of empty structure (7 Replies)
Discussion started by: ramneek
7 Replies
Login or Register to Ask a Question