![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Rules & FAQ | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| OS X (Apple) OS X is a line of Unix-based graphical operating systems developed, marketed, and sold by Apple. |
Other UNIX.COM Threads You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A challenging problem involving symbolic links. | ibloom | High Level Programming | 2 | 03-24-2008 06:07 AM |
| Symbolic Links | rcarnesiii | AIX | 1 | 08-17-2005 11:57 AM |
| cp a dty without symbolic links? | JAKEZ | SUN Solaris | 7 | 09-21-2004 09:55 AM |
| Symbolic Links for a File | b_u_n_1234 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 4 | 03-06-2002 08:58 AM |
| Finding symbolic links | mehtad | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 11-15-2001 02:26 PM |
![]() |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Problem changing owner of symbolic links?
Strangely, chown and chmod don't seem to work on symlinks. In particular, I tried this (as root):
# touch foo # ln -s foo mysymlink # chown SOMEUSER mysymlink as well as changing the last line to: # chown -h someuser mysymlink where "-h" is supposed to change the UID of the actualy symbolic link. However both yield: # ls -l mysymlink lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 3 7 Jun 16:50 mysymlink -> foo Also, I tried changing the user of the target file, but this has no affect on the user of the symlinked file. This is very annoying! Anyone know what is going on? I'm using OS X 10.3.4. Thanks, Noah |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|