![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Rules & FAQ | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| News, Links, Events and Announcements Noncommerical links to UNIX related news goes here in this forum! |
Other UNIX.COM Threads You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Microsoft Security Advisory (937696): Release of Microsoft Office Isolated Conversion | iBot | Security Advisories (RSS) - Microsoft | 0 | 12-24-2007 06:00 AM |
| Microsoft Security Advisory (932114): Vulnerability in Microsoft Word 2000 Could Allo | iBot | Security Advisories (RSS) - Microsoft | 0 | 12-24-2007 06:00 AM |
| Microsoft Security Advisory (927892): Vulnerability in Microsoft XML Core Services Co | iBot | Security Advisories (RSS) - Microsoft | 0 | 12-24-2007 06:00 AM |
| Microsoft Security Advisory (909444): Various Issues After Installing Microsoft Secur | iBot | Security Advisories (RSS) - Microsoft | 0 | 12-24-2007 06:00 AM |
| Lindows | jar0 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 08-21-2003 07:22 AM |
![]() |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Now what I'm waiting for is for someone to take all of the code that still falls under the GNU license (most of the operating system, as I see it) or another code-distributable license, and post it publicly.
According to the GNU license, you can charge for the code if you want, but then it leaves your control - the licensing party can resell or redistribute as they wish. According to this link, they "ask" that you not redistribute, but as it pertains to specific code, I don't think they can restrict you from doing so. Standard disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, nor have I consulted with someone who knows the law factually. Neither unix.com nor myself are responsible if you take this comentary as fact. If ingested, drink a Singapore Sling and contact you local poison control center. |
||||
| Google UNIX.COM |