![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| MySQL DevZone RSS MySQL Developer Zone RSS |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trying to manage an inherited Ksh script | ajcannon | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 08-15-2007 06:54 AM |
| Manage Mail | SUSANR9999 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 11-14-2006 05:10 PM |
| NIS server to manage NFS quota | izy100 | SUN Solaris | 0 | 08-03-2006 01:08 PM |
| AIX versus Networks | rawatmohinder | AIX | 5 | 05-23-2006 05:54 AM |
| Touchpad not working - SuSE 8.2 - Toshiba Satellite A30 | zazzybob | SuSE | 3 | 09-15-2004 05:04 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||||
|
Using Partitioning to Manage Satellite Networks
Our product historically used an Oracle backend, and after implementing simple date based range partitioning we got 20-30 time performance increase in our queries. We had used MySQL in other more minor products we had developed, but we couldn’t move to it until partitioning was implemented. In Dec 05 we started to test MySQL partitioning, where partitioning syntax was supported but the optimisations were not in place. As soon as the optimisations we put in, we were able to run a side by side comparison against unpartitioned tables and Oracle partitions. Not only did we get in MySQL a 30+ times performance increase, but the MySQL version ran nearly twice as fast as the same Oracle configuration in a like for like test.
More... |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|