Linux and UNIX Man Pages

Linux & Unix Commands - Search Man Pages

drop_aggregate(7) [suse man page]

DROP 
AGGREGATE(7) SQL Commands DROP AGGREGATE(7) NAME
DROP AGGREGATE - remove an aggregate function SYNOPSIS
DROP AGGREGATE [ IF EXISTS ] name ( type [ , ... ] ) [ CASCADE | RESTRICT ] DESCRIPTION
DROP AGGREGATE removes an existing aggregate function. To execute this command the current user must be the owner of the aggregate func- tion. PARAMETERS
IF EXISTS Do not throw an error if the aggregate does not exist. A notice is issued in this case. name The name (optionally schema-qualified) of an existing aggregate function. type An input data type on which the aggregate function operates. To reference a zero-argument aggregate function, write * in place of the list of input data types. CASCADE Automatically drop objects that depend on the aggregate function. RESTRICT Refuse to drop the aggregate function if any objects depend on it. This is the default. EXAMPLES
To remove the aggregate function myavg for type integer: DROP AGGREGATE myavg(integer); COMPATIBILITY
There is no DROP AGGREGATE statement in the SQL standard. SEE ALSO
ALTER AGGREGATE [alter_aggregate(7)], CREATE AGGREGATE [create_aggregate(7)] SQL - Language Statements 2010-05-14 DROP AGGREGATE(7)

Check Out this Related Man Page

ALTER 
AGGREGATE(7) SQL Commands ALTER AGGREGATE(7) NAME
ALTER AGGREGATE - change the definition of an aggregate function SYNOPSIS
ALTER AGGREGATE name ( type [ , ... ] ) RENAME TO new_name ALTER AGGREGATE name ( type [ , ... ] ) OWNER TO new_owner ALTER AGGREGATE name ( type [ , ... ] ) SET SCHEMA new_schema DESCRIPTION
ALTER AGGREGATE changes the definition of an aggregate function. You must own the aggregate function to use ALTER AGGREGATE. To change the schema of an aggregate function, you must also have CREATE priv- ilege on the new schema. To alter the owner, you must also be a direct or indirect member of the new owning role, and that role must have CREATE privilege on the aggregate function's schema. (These restrictions enforce that altering the owner doesn't do anything you couldn't do by dropping and recreating the aggregate function. However, a superuser can alter ownership of any aggregate function anyway.) PARAMETERS
name The name (optionally schema-qualified) of an existing aggregate function. type An input data type on which the aggregate function operates. To reference a zero-argument aggregate function, write * in place of the list of input data types. new_name The new name of the aggregate function. new_owner The new owner of the aggregate function. new_schema The new schema for the aggregate function. EXAMPLES
To rename the aggregate function myavg for type integer to my_average: ALTER AGGREGATE myavg(integer) RENAME TO my_average; To change the owner of the aggregate function myavg for type integer to joe: ALTER AGGREGATE myavg(integer) OWNER TO joe; To move the aggregate function myavg for type integer into schema myschema: ALTER AGGREGATE myavg(integer) SET SCHEMA myschema; COMPATIBILITY
There is no ALTER AGGREGATE statement in the SQL standard. SEE ALSO
CREATE AGGREGATE [create_aggregate(7)], DROP AGGREGATE [drop_aggregate(7)] SQL - Language Statements 2010-05-14 ALTER AGGREGATE(7)
Man Page

3 More Discussions You Might Find Interesting

1. UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers

aggregate ethernet ports under Solaris

I have been looking for info on how to aggregate 2 ore 3 NIC's into into one big pipe. Any advice would be appreciated. -Chuck (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: 98_1LE
4 Replies

2. UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users

AWK aggregate records

Hy all, I have a problem...can some one help me... I have a file of records sort: 30|239|ORD|447702936929 |blackberry.net |20080728|141304|00000900|2|0000000000000536|28181|0000000006|0000000001|10|1 30|239|ORD|447702936929 |blackberry.net ... (4 Replies)
Discussion started by: anaconga
4 Replies

3. Shell Programming and Scripting

Aggregation of huge data

Hi Friends, I have a file with sample amount data as follows: -89990.3456 8788798.990000128 55109787.20 -12455558989.90876 I need to exclude the '-' symbol in order to treat all values as an absolute one and then I need to sum up.The record count is around 1 million. How... (8 Replies)
Discussion started by: Ravichander
8 Replies