FMS(4) BSD Kernel Interfaces Manual FMS(4)NAME
fms -- Forte Media FM801 audio device driver
SYNOPSIS
fms* at pci? dev ? function ?
audio* at audiobus?
mpu* at fms?
opl* at fms?
DESCRIPTION
The fms device driver supports the Forte Media FM801 sound card.
SEE ALSO ac97(4), audio(4), mpu(4), opl(4), pci(4)HISTORY
The fms device driver appeared in NetBSD 1.5.
BSD June 22, 2005 BSD
Check Out this Related Man Page
SND_FM801(4) BSD Kernel Interfaces Manual SND_FM801(4)NAME
snd_fm801 -- Forte Media FM801 bridge device driver
SYNOPSIS
To compile this driver into the kernel, place the following lines in your kernel configuration file:
device sound
device snd_fm801
Alternatively, to load the driver as a module at boot time, place the following line in loader.conf(5):
snd_fm801_load="YES"
DESCRIPTION
The snd_fm801 bridge driver allows the generic audio driver, sound(4), to attach audio devices based on the Forte Media FM801 chipset. This
is a common chipset found in various parts used by OEM manufacturers.
HARDWARE
The snd_fm801 driver supports audio devices based on the following chipset:
o Forte Media FM801
SEE ALSO sound(4)HISTORY
The snd_fm801 device driver first appeared in FreeBSD 4.2.
AUTHORS
This manual page was written by Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org>.
BUGS
The Forte Media FM801 chipset is a sort of PCI bridge, not an actual sound controller, making it possible to have soundless support. One
problem is that both chipsets, with and without sound support, use the same PCI ID. This makes it impossible to determine which one is
installed.
BSD December 1, 2005 BSD
Fault Management System. I think it is an in-house application but I am not sure. So if there are people out there that know this application, I have a few questions about it. (0 Replies)
Hi all,
i'm trying to upgrade pandorafms to the new version 4.0.3-130118,
actually i have installed on my machine the version 3.0.0-8.1.el5,
the error i'm getting when trying to update its the following
rpm -Uvh pandorafms_agent_unix-4.0.3-130118.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
... (1 Reply)