![]() |
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Linux RedHat, Ubuntu, SUSE, Fedora, Debian, Mandriva, Slackware, Gentoo linux, PCLinuxOS. All Linux questions here! |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| simple script detect to find OS version/flavour | fed.linuxgossip | Shell Programming and Scripting | 13 | 08-14-2008 01:04 AM |
| Distribution Release: Rocks Cluster Distribution 5.0 | iBot | Software Releases - RSS News | 0 | 05-01-2008 01:30 AM |
| Help me to select the flavour | collins | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 10-20-2004 07:17 PM |
| unix flavour on mac | ora | OS X (Apple) | 9 | 06-23-2004 12:16 AM |
| Which flavour? | clanger | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 07-11-2001 06:16 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
What is the difference between flavour & distribution.
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me the difference between flavour & distribution? As we say that - AIX, Linux, Solaris etc are the flavours of Unix & fedora, ubuntu, suse etc are the distributions of linux. Can anyone explain me, why it is called so. Thanks in advance. Amol |
|
||||
|
Well, technically Linux is "NOT" a UNIX. It uses the Linux kernel and the GNU userland utilities. As such GNU stands for "Gnu's Not Unix" and instead is a UNIX-like operating environment.
Also, while AIX, Solaris, BSD, HP-UX and even Mac OSX are "UNIX" depending on the actual certification from whoever holds the rights to determine what UNIX is, many people lump them together as the tools are similar and the commands are similar in most cases. In the case of a distribution, that is due to the maintainer's decisions of what to include, how to control the releases, etc. SUSE, Debian, Red Hat, are all using the Linux kernel, GNU userland, etc, however Debian uses different package management, for the most part, Different run levels and configuration files are employed, and the choice of what goes into a release is left up to the maintainer of each distribution. |
|
||||
|
It's a kernel that, together with GNU, makes a system that fits quite a lot of the UNIX specification. The backronym is an obsolete joke, and there is no extant Real UNIX©®™ operating system and hasn't been for a long time, so I'd love to hear a reason beyond "well, it's not directly descended from BSD" for the constant parroting I hear of this...
|
|
||||
|
What is UNIX ?
You can read for yourself. There is also a mark, or brand, that is used to identify those products that have been certified as conforming to the Single UNIX Specification, initially UNIX 93, followed subsequently by UNIX 95, UNIX 98 and now UNIX 03. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|