![]() |
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| IP Networking Learn TCP/IP, Internet Protocol, Routing, Routers, Network protocols in this UNIX and Linux forum. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IPtables | 182x | IP Networking | 1 | 11-28-2006 02:03 AM |
| best frontend for iptables? | piltrafa | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 3 | 08-17-2005 02:23 PM |
| IPtables | Jody | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 3 | 05-31-2003 09:08 PM |
| sendmail/mail masquerade problem | m.szylkarski | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 1 | 02-13-2003 10:27 PM |
| iptables, ftp | sTorm | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 03-19-2002 03:18 AM |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Greetings to all.
My new firewall is giving me one hell of a problem. I'm running iptables and masquerading my intranet thru NAT. But here is the problem. Whenever I try to FTP to a server outside of my lan I get a 500 illegal port error. I've come to the conclusion that NAT is using a port too high for most servers out there. Does anyone know where I can set a better range to work with? Any recomendations on what range would be better? I've only got a handful of machines behind it but they are a web server and an SQL server so they might be a little busy but not a huge drain on ports. Thank You in Advance. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|