The UNIX and Linux Forums  
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.

Go Back   The UNIX and Linux Forums > Special Forums > IP Networking
.
google unix.com



IP Networking Learn TCP/IP, Internet Protocol, Routing, Routers, Network protocols in this UNIX and Linux forum.

More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
need some info about symbolic link and hard link detective linux UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 01-08-2008 07:36 AM
Complex Event Processing and FX market aggregation iBot Complex Event Processing RSS News 0 07-02-2007 01:52 AM
Link Aggregation and LACP hcclnoodles UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users 1 04-06-2007 06:45 AM
Link Aggregation hcclnoodles SUN Solaris 2 04-06-2007 04:37 AM
Difference between hard link and soft link in unix RAJACHOKALINGAM UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers 2 08-01-2006 04:10 AM

Closed Thread
English Japanese Spanish French German Portuguese Italian Dutch Swedish Russian Norwegian Hungarian Hebrew Danish Powered by Powered by Google
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008
jaredo jaredo is offline
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
bonding lacp and link aggregation

Hello, I am trying to get clarity on a few things and am looking for some info.

In every article I have read about link aggregation and lacp, it can be used combine physical links to create 1 logical link for increased bandwidth.

But what it doesn't say is if this is limited by source/dst. IE 1 destination can only reach the capacity of one of the physical links, or if in fact it is a true 4GB connection. I have looked into several hashing methods, and linux bonding seems to support round robin which would do what I am looking for. However, VMware/ESX does not have this type of bonding, just IP/Mac/Port hasing.

I have had these results trying to setup a 4GB connection from ESX<->switch, and Linux/NFS<->switch over 4 1gb nics. In the end results I am trying to get 320/MB disk transfer between the vmware server and the Linux/NFS/Disk array I have setup. Is LACP the wrong choice maybe? Or has anyone been able to set this up and if so what type of hardware?
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008
ramen_noodle ramen_noodle is offline Forum Advisor  
Registered User
  
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia, USA.
Posts: 251
If you have a source DTE with 4 1gb/s interfaces trunked into a duplex capable 10g switch then you should easily attain your desired throughput. Whether the end host system can receive 320/mbs throughput depends on it's configuration. It's noted that lacp is far from perfect without factoring in the latencies from NFS and/or VM translation. Also, your backend potential throughput is faster than a lot of local
disk buses.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Language Translations Powered by .
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
The UNIX and Linux Forums Content Copyright ©1993-2009. All Rights Reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0