![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| IP Networking Learn TCP/IP, Internet Protocol, Routing, Routers, Network protocols in this UNIX and Linux forum. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| entry in /etc/hosts | mig28mx | Red Hat | 1 | 02-27-2009 12:48 PM |
| Hosts.deny entry | mojoman | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 3 | 01-08-2009 03:55 PM |
| delete entry from /etc/hosts file ? | hcclnoodles | Shell Programming and Scripting | 1 | 10-16-2008 11:51 AM |
| FTP file to different hosts | coolkid | Shell Programming and Scripting | 4 | 08-06-2008 06:41 PM |
| HOSTS File | cymerman | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 4 | 01-19-2007 12:26 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Hosts file ignored, no DNS entry but still routes!!
Hi all,
I have an entry in my hosts file on a server called tractor as follows: Code:
10.67.34.128 digger-m2m digger Code:
new_dns1.oam.uk can't find digger: Non existant host/domain If I ping digger from tractor I can see by running a snoop on digger that I am pinging the 172 address but clearly my hosts file has digger listed at the 10 address. I'm begining to wonder if tractor has somehow cached an association between digger and the 172 address. If so does anybody know how to clear it, or know why I'm getting the above behaviour with my hosts file seemingly being ignored? Thanks!!!! -----Post Update----- I've just discovered that if I change my host entry on tractor to have digger_new at the end of it rather than just digger and then I ping digger_new it pings the right address. So why does it not like digger? hmmmmmmmmm |
| Sponsored Links | ||
|
|