![]() |
Hello and Welcome from United States to the UNIX and Linux Forums! Thank You for Visiting and Joining Our Global Community.
|
|
google unix.com
|
|||||||
| Forums | Register | Forum Rules | Links | Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| High Level Programming Post questions about C, C++, Java, SQL, and other programming languages here. |
More UNIX and Linux Forum Topics You Might Find Helpful
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using GDB to analyse different CORE dumps | nsdeeps | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 04-16-2008 12:10 AM |
| SCO 5.07 Panic / Core Dumps | ccarcher | SCO | 5 | 01-19-2007 05:12 AM |
| strcmp core dumps | annie | High Level Programming | 6 | 02-26-2006 10:23 AM |
| Generating core dumps | handak9 | SUN Solaris | 4 | 09-08-2004 04:07 AM |
| reading core dumps | suntan | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 2 | 04-23-2003 09:29 PM |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
|
I introduced the segv intentionally via the following char *x; x=0 *x = 5; But no core file is generated, when this is in one of the threads, but in main I get a core file. So my question is why isn't a core generated for the threads segmentation violation? Hope that clarifies the question. thanks for any input. Ken |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|