![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Portal | Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Contribute | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| High Level Programming Post questions about C, C++, Java, SQL, and other programming languages here. |
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Core Dump | vinp | UNIX for Advanced & Expert Users | 1 | 10-22-2007 04:49 AM |
| core dump | hassan2 | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 4 | 05-07-2002 05:05 AM |
| core dump | buRst | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 2 | 12-15-2001 08:26 AM |
| core dump | sskb | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 6 | 12-04-2001 11:59 PM |
| help, what is the difference between core dump and panic dump? | aileen | UNIX for Dummies Questions & Answers | 1 | 06-11-2001 05:08 PM |
|
|
Submit Tools | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Getting Core dump.. Plz Help !!
Hi,
I am getting core dump for the following code in HP-UNIX platform. void *Et: { return(NULL); } Can we return a NULL value for a void function ?? I have a program, where almost all functions are written like this. But, for this function, I am getting core dump. Please suggest !! Thanks in advance.. |
| Forum Sponsor | ||
|
|
|
|||
|
First of all it's not a void function, this fuction returns pointer (void *).
There is nothing wrong if function returns null pointer, usually meaning it failed to do job as expected. Check if you don't derefernce this pointer without null pointer check. |
|||
| Google The UNIX and Linux Forums |